Disappointed with On the Slant

Discuss the views of your favorite Genii columnists.
Posts: 32
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 4:08 pm
Location: Northern Neck, Virginia

Disappointed with On the Slant

Postby hgebeaux » August 27th, 2009, 2:29 pm

I found Jon Racherbaumer's discussion of "Gifts" rather interesting. Until, that is, the very end. If he had indeed felt that Eddie Fields deserved credit for the "Princess Card Trick" being published in The Jinx 75th anniversary tribute, then he should just have included his name in the "billing" of the effect. But to claim he was showing love and gratitude by giving him the "gift" of conferring "all credit to him," and THEN letting everyone know in his column that the effect was really his and his name was being left off because he was being nice - well that just didn't hit me right.
If, indeed, it was a gift, then just let it be a gift. Let Eddie Fields have the billing and step out of the picture. Let him accept the applause. But to make sure everyone knew that it was really his effect, to me, tarnished the gift idea completely. Smacks of egotism for sure. So disappointing.
Howard Gebeaux

Jon Racherbaumer
Posts: 843
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: New Orleans

Re: Disappointed with On the Slant

Postby Jon Racherbaumer » August 27th, 2009, 2:50 pm

I agree with Howard up to a point; however, I apparently did not make myself clear in SLANT? What follows is not meant to be a mea culpa as much as it is an explanation. What many of us fail to mention when crediting anything are our POINTS OF INSPIRATION, which, without them, the rest probably wouldn't have happened.

"Surprising the Princess" (original title) was definitely inspired by something Eddie Fields suggested. I then figured out a way to do it. I also contributed this method in the 70s when I was more naive about such things. These days I'm completely uninterested in receiving credit for MYSELF. Frankly, I'm not that creative when itcomes to inventing tricks or devising methods. I'm more like a parrot. When Harry Anderson suggested putting this trick in the JINX TRIBUTE pub, I decided to credit Fields because I now hold INSPIRATIONAL POINTS in much higher regard. Besides, I still have not sufficiently repaid Eddie Fields for what he "gifted" me. Better late than never.

Regardless, I thank the poster for his observations and I hope that readers at least understood the underlying messages about GIFTS rather than focus on my failings to practice what I'm preaching.

Nikodemus Siivola
Posts: 29
Joined: January 24th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Disappointed with On the Slant

Postby Nikodemus Siivola » August 28th, 2009, 3:09 am

I have yet to receive the issue, but I for one am glad that true background is revealed.

While I'm certain the trick is an excellent one that Mr. Fields would have been proud of, in general undisclosed misattributions are called forgeries -- and I'm pretty sure you would not credit a trick to Hofzinzer without making it clear that you are the actual author and the venerable Viennese an inspirational source.

So: hooray for pulling back the curtain on this one.

User avatar
Richard Kaufman
Posts: 24048
Joined: July 18th, 2001, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Theodore DeLand
Location: Washington DC

Re: Disappointed with On the Slant

Postby Richard Kaufman » August 28th, 2009, 1:22 pm

As Racherbaumer explains quite clearly, this is a trick he'd published under his name in the past, and decided that the changes he made were not worth the full credit to him, and so he changed the credit to Fields.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine

Return to “Columns”