Orson Welles On Magic Books

All beginners in magic should address their questions here.
Bob Farmer
Posts: 3311
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Short card above selection.

Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Bob Farmer » October 31st, 2023, 7:56 am

In 1947 Orson Welles wrote the forward to Bruce Elliott's wonderful book, Magic As A Hobby. Much or perhaps all of what he had to say is as meaningful today as it was then, especially with the Youtube idiots gleefully exposing tricks they did not invent in hopes of clicks and cash. Here it is with some spacing added.



It is entirely possible that this excellent book should never have been published - not like this; anyway, not for general sale.

There are two kinds of magic books, you know. The kind they give away with the box top off a breakfast cereal, and this kind of book, which tells explicitly and with pictures - so the reader can really get the hang of them - valuable secrets of professional magic.

In brief, I'm sorry that this one is so very good but I'd be honestly sorrier if it were bad.

At the outset it should be explained that the author of these prefatory sentiments is one of that dwindling and gloomy body of cranks who wish magic could have been kept a mystery. In his view magic's worst enemies are that spreading section in any audience who know how the trick is done. It should be granted that a puzzle solved before it's shown is just about as publicly attractive as an unmade bed. A real magician's task, it seems clear, is to abolish the solution, the possibility of any solution in the minds of those he seeks to amuse.

And this is certain: He'll fail to amuse if he doesn't amaze.

Removing from magic the element of wonder is no less disastrous than music without the element of pitch.

There are some fine entertainers who use magic props in the sole service of comedy, but they are no more magicians than the clown with the breakaway fiddle is a violinist.
In magic's golden age magicians offered laughter as a part of the show but never permitted disenchantment. For a marvellous hour or two they elevated their most adult audiences to the status of delighted children.

This art has fallen into decadence.

Wizards, deposed from the appropriate gilt and glamour of the playhouse, work their wonders these evenings in the frowzy hubbub of the cabaret, competing with bad whiskey for control of their beholders' minds. The children are all home asleep, and of course the children are magic's source and meaning, magic itself being, after all, no more than a formal and serious approach to the important business of playing with toys.

Comic papers and even magazine advertisements assail the young with diagrams and legends laying bare the most cherished secrets of the wizard's trade. A child is so completely informed today or so completely bored with the whole subject that he finds a magic show no more entrancing than a stale joke.

Unless of course, he wants to do the magic himself.

For in this, the least interesting and least secretive of all the ages of magic, the most interesting and most secretive magician is the amateur. This is a fairly new and immensely important development.

Our world is crowded with eager gentlemen busily begging somebody, anybody, "please take a card," and this is only sad because so small a part of the remaing population has any wish to take a card, or indeed, wants ever again to see another card trick. Yet each year hundreds of "new" tricks fatten the magic catalogues. Subtleties and sleights beyond possible count or practical usefulness are printed monthly. We are told that never before has there been such an interest in magic; but this, I'm afraid, is simply interest in magic by other magicians - and would-be magicians at that.

Not that the would-be's aren't often skillful enough to be the real thing. But you don't get to be a magician by joining a magic club or living in a magic store. You can only be a magician by putting on a magic show, you can only put on a magic show by getting an audience to come to see it. The bad news is that the dealers are selling more tricks while the theatres are selling less and less tickets.
Now, I can't persuade myself that wholesale dissemination of magic's backstage lore hasn't contributed heavily to this present plight.

The profession - and with it the art of magic - is most surely done for unless secrets like the ones to be found in this book are more carefully kept from the attention of the merely curious. That's where you come in - you, the serious reader. There is enough in these pages to equip a thoughtful student with half a career of real performances. An idle hour or two with this remarkable work, however, will also fully equip mutton-heads and hecklers to spoil much of the best magical entertainments. The purpose of this foreward is to suggest that this should happen just as seldom as you can possibly help.

For I come not to bury magic but rather to point out that a very high respect is due these following effects; that the reader proceeds at magic's risk. If all he wants to know is how the magician does his stuff, let him shop elsewhere. But the reader's intentions are honorable, we're sure; and here, if he pleases - in spite of years of syndicated exposes - are miracles. Let him learn them carefully and perform them to their credit. Well executed they are sure to astonish and delight.

Magic is starving for a new audience. If astonishment and delight won't bring an audience into a playhouse any more, then of course something is rotten in the state of the Union, and it isn't only magic that is doomed.

Orson Welles

Joe Lyons
Posts: 878
Joined: November 13th, 2017, 8:27 am
Favorite Magician: Wonder
Location: Texas

Re: Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Joe Lyons » October 31st, 2023, 8:36 am

Orson Welles wrote:Wizards, deposed from the appropriate gilt and glamour of the playhouse, work their wonders these evenings in the frowzy hubbub of the cabaret, competing with bad whiskey for control of their beholders' minds.


Mr. Welles's gift of phrase turning was equal to his talent in filmmaking.

The evergreen sentiment of the entire forward, while different, reminds me of Max's Protocols.

Dick Koornwinder
Posts: 171
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Re: Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Dick Koornwinder » October 31st, 2023, 10:20 am

Yesterday 85 years ago Orson Welles made history with the radio play “War of the Worlds”.
Quote from Wikipedia:
"The War of the Worlds" was a Halloween episode of the radio series The Mercury Theatre on the Air directed and narrated by Orson Welles as an adaptation of H. G. Wells's novel The War of the Worlds (1898) that was performed and broadcast live at 8 pm ET on October 30, 1938 over the CBS Radio Network. The episode is famous for inciting panic by convincing some members of the listening audience that a Martian invasion was taking place, though the scale of panic is disputed, as the program had relatively few listeners.

User avatar
Dustin Stinett
Posts: 7263
Joined: July 22nd, 2001, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Sometimes
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Dustin Stinett » October 31st, 2023, 11:56 am

Dick: When I was a kid, I had "The War of the Worlds" on a record (part of an old radio shows set that my parents bought). I plain ol' wore it out.

Thanks, Bob, for starting this thread. More Orson!

Tarotist
Posts: 1413
Joined: July 29th, 2021, 7:16 am
Favorite Magician: David Nixon

Re: Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Tarotist » October 31st, 2023, 12:10 pm

I have referenced this Orson Welles foreword many times myself in the past. Here is what I said about it on this very forum last year:

"I am terribly old fashioned and I believe the less the bastards know the better. Anyway, this is what Orson Welles had to say on the matter.

http://wellesnet.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=308"

Dick Koornwinder
Posts: 171
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Re: Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Dick Koornwinder » October 31st, 2023, 1:13 pm

[quote="Dustin Stinett"]Dick: When I was a kid, I had "The War of the Worlds" on a record (part of an old radio shows set that my parents bought). I plain ol' wore it out.]

Dustin, back to the past: https://youtu.be/Bqy7gLMZjjo?si=-Pbi_ApqsKev52gi

User avatar
Dustin Stinett
Posts: 7263
Joined: July 22nd, 2001, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Sometimes
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Dustin Stinett » October 31st, 2023, 1:57 pm

Thanks Dick ... Happy All Hallows' Eve!

Bill Mullins
Posts: 5918
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Bill Mullins » November 1st, 2023, 12:05 am

Joe Lyons wrote:Mr. Welles's gift of phrase turning was equal to his talent in filmmaking.


Agreed.

User avatar
Grippo's Wish
Posts: 74
Joined: July 9th, 2012, 5:05 am
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Grippo's Wish » November 1st, 2023, 5:17 pm

what's the best o. wells biography? One the explores his "magic" side

Bob Farmer
Posts: 3311
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Short card above selection.

Re: Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Bob Farmer » November 1st, 2023, 5:33 pm


Joe Lyons
Posts: 878
Joined: November 13th, 2017, 8:27 am
Favorite Magician: Wonder
Location: Texas

Re: Orson Welles On Magic Books

Postby Joe Lyons » November 1st, 2023, 5:38 pm

If it's a book you want, I would think this one by Bart Whaley.


Return to “General”