The Word Magic
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: July 8th, 2010, 8:55 pm
The Word Magic
Would someone define the word magic for me.
The single absolute truth is that we don't know.
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: June 7th, 2015, 12:48 pm
- Favorite Magician: Bill Malone
- Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Re: The Word Magic
Al Schneider wrote:Would someone define the word magic for me.
Before I take a crack at offering my own subjective definition, I will preface it by saying that there are probably at least as many different definitions of magic as there are magicians. OK, here goes:
Magic is the art of creating false premises in order to manipulate the logical reasoning processes of the spectators, and thus create the illusion of an occurrence that appears to be impossible in light of their preconceptions and/or under natural laws as they understand them to be. I would add that the essence of a good magic trick is the creation of astonishment and surprise.
-
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: August 19th, 2013, 10:49 pm
- Favorite Magician: All of the very best!
- Location: Magicville
Re: The Word Magic
How about…
Something taking place which our empirical experiences tell us is not supposed to be possible under normal circumstances.
Something taking place which our empirical experiences tell us is not supposed to be possible under normal circumstances.
-
- Posts: 368
- Joined: December 24th, 2015, 10:29 am
- Favorite Magician: Paul Megram
Re: The Word Magic
I'd say that that's definition of conjuring, not of magic.MagicbyAlfred wrote:Magic is the art of creating false premises in order to etc
- Richard Kaufman
- Posts: 27068
- Joined: July 18th, 2001, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Theodore DeLand
- Location: Washington DC
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 8709
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
Magic in our world
Difficult as folks around here don't want their private narrative, everyday social narrative, or larger historical narrative to include "intention as cause". Destiny, fate, fortune and luck... are okay but we don't consider karma a branch of physics around here.
We are given license to present "intention as cause" around here within context of entertainment. Others are given license to use that notion in non-entertainment context.
We are given license to present "intention as cause" around here within context of entertainment. Others are given license to use that notion in non-entertainment context.
- Tom Frame
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Del Ray
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
“If you take any activity, any art, any discipline, any skill, take it and push it as far as it will go, push it beyond where it has ever been before, push it to the wildest edge of edges, then you force it into the realm of magic.”
-Tom Robbins
-Tom Robbins
- Tom Frame
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Del Ray
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
But Robbins also concedes that, “Using words to describe magic is like using a screwdriver to cut roast beef.”
-
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: August 19th, 2013, 10:49 pm
- Favorite Magician: All of the very best!
- Location: Magicville
Re: The Word Magic
Talk about opening a can of worms.
Re: The Word Magic
Al Schneider wrote:Would someone define the word magic for me.
That is quite tricky. I've tried for ages, and no matter what kind of definition I've come up with, it still doesn't take long before I find some piece that falls outside the definition. So far, "I know it when I see it" is the only definition that always hold water.
However, it seems like a human operator need to be present to bring about the desired reaction. My friend Johan Ståhl once arranged an exhibit with a few automatic items, like a drawer in a writer's desk that worked like a Drawer Box, on/off automatically. The reactions were vastly different when the visitors tried the drawer on their own, compared to when Johan simply stood beside it. The same with Mark Setteducati's book "The Magic Show". A layperson working the tricks of the book alone doesn't react the same way, as they do when a magician is sitting next to them. It seems that for "magic" to occur, there need to be a human present to attribute the experience to.
It also seem to require a certain amount of prerequisite knowledge on the spectator's part. Doing mental magic for, let's say New Age believers, often get no reactions beside mild smiles and gentle nodding, as it more confirm what they assume is the natural order of things. For it to seem "magic" that fire comes out of your hands, the audience must know that fire doesn't usually behave like that.
Jim Steinmeyer once said that magic is a "cat and mouse game", and I think that it is an aspect that also need to be present. We all experience loads of seemingly "impossible" things each day, without giving it a second thought, because we just assume that if we looked at it closer, we would find it to be ordinary. If you casually vanish a coin or change denomination of a bill for someone who doesn't know you are a magician, in a context outside a performance, they will often show very little reactions, as they'll assume you accidentally dropped the coin when they wasn't paying attention, or that they just saw wrong. It seems that for "magic" to occur, we must first set up the roles of "magician" and "spectator" where it is clear that the task of the former is to try to decieve and the role of the latter is to be decieved regardless of any attempts to avoid deception.
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: October 21st, 2017, 11:02 am
- Favorite Magician: Doug Henning
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
Tom Stone wrote: It seems that for "magic" to occur, we must first set up the roles of "magician" and "spectator" where it is clear that the task of the former is to try to decieve and the role of the latter is to be decieved regardless of any attempts to avoid deception.
Tell that to Michael Carbonaro
-
- Posts: 8709
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
Peter Ross wrote:Tom Stone wrote: It seems that for "magic" to occur, we must first set up the roles of "magician" and "spectator" where it is clear that the task of the former is to try to decieve and the role of the latter is to be decieved regardless of any attempts to avoid deception.
Tell that to Michael Carbonaro
Did Michael Carbonaro discuss his approach to presenting magic? If so, what did he suggest?
The Tim Robbins lines are directed at the reader and not our community; eliciting the notion for the reader.
For that matter the Clarke line folks trot out for reference is about storytelling - which might be a good place to look for distinctions between magic and other means of getting to goals.
What do folks think about the Robert-Houdin clever devices plus trickery approach? The magic being understood as something beyond what's plausible for a device.
Re: The Word Magic
Peter Ross wrote:Tom Stone wrote: It seems that for "magic" to occur, we must first set up the roles of "magician" and "spectator" where it is clear that the task of the former is to try to decieve and the role of the latter is to be decieved regardless of any attempts to avoid deception.
Tell that to Michael Carbonaro
In many Carbonaro segments I've seen, the onlookers doesn't percieve any magic effect. Like:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2XsWM2uhyE
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: October 21st, 2017, 11:02 am
- Favorite Magician: Doug Henning
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
Correct. So what Carbonaro is doing would not be classified as magic according to your statement (which I agree with).
If the "spectator" is unaware there is a magician performing magic to them, is it still a magic performance?
If the "spectator" is unaware there is a magician performing magic to them, is it still a magic performance?
-
- Posts: 8709
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
@Peter, in other contexts such could be looked at as a short con, or the demonstration of a charlatan, ... not our craft of entertainment.
-
- Posts: 2014
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Sacramento
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
Have honestly never understood the fascination with this (See Paul Wilson's boring "Our Magic" Documentary, where he wastes potentially great interviews with stellar talent by forcing them to answer this somewhat vague, kinda useless question.)
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: October 21st, 2017, 11:02 am
- Favorite Magician: Doug Henning
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
In regards to how "magic" is defined, I think Tom Stone bringing up this point is relevant and interesting.
If you do not consider the discussion about magic without the magician vague and useless, there is more on it in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=53440&p=367163&hilit=Carbonaro#p367163
I wonder how David Regal views the show in the context of traditionally defined magic.
If you do not consider the discussion about magic without the magician vague and useless, there is more on it in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=53440&p=367163&hilit=Carbonaro#p367163
I wonder how David Regal views the show in the context of traditionally defined magic.
Re: The Word Magic
Magic - Noun - Any sudden and often unexpected surprise that makes you smile or laugh, even when your jaw just dropped practically to your knees.
-
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: August 19th, 2013, 10:49 pm
- Favorite Magician: All of the very best!
- Location: Magicville
Re: The Word Magic
Chris Aguilar wrote:Have honestly never understood the fascination with this (See Paul Wilson's boring "Our Magic" Documentary, where he wastes potentially great interviews with stellar talent by forcing them to answer this somewhat vague, kinda useless question.)
I have to agree with that Chris! I found it silly to waste time asking that question. And, of course, everyone felt the need to come up with a creative answer.
After I posted my response here, I was sorry I even bothered. What’s the point? Maybe to analyze the heck out of the word.
Does it matter how it is defined? I say no. Magic has its benefits without the need to define it. Just perform it or watch it for goodness sake!
Thank you very much.
Re: The Word Magic
Writing clarifies thought.
Defining what you practice, if only for yourself, could only aid your development.
Defining what you practice, if only for yourself, could only aid your development.
- katterfelt0
- Posts: 276
- Joined: February 2nd, 2021, 2:11 pm
- Favorite Magician: Depends on the day. Today, Rick Maue.
Re: The Word Magic
Joe Lyons wrote:Writing clarifies thought.
Defining what you practice, if only for yourself, could only aid your development.
Exactly. When I look at a routine I might want to add, I consider (among other things) whether it fits my definition of magic (Matrix) or not (gambling routines).
Effect and method are inextricably linked.
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: October 21st, 2017, 11:02 am
- Favorite Magician: Doug Henning
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
Sorry, one more point about The Carbonbaro Effect as it relates to a definition of magic - it occurred to me that the people watching the "show" from their TVs are the true spectators, per Tom Stone's requirement. We know we're watching a magician perform a trick, waiting to be amazed and not knowing when it's going to happen, and then being delighted (per Richard Kaufman) at the effect. It's a magic show for us, but arguably a prank for the person it's being performed on.
- Paco Nagata
- Posts: 437
- Joined: July 3rd, 2019, 6:47 am
- Favorite Magician: Juan Tamariz
- Location: Madrid, Spain.
Re: The Word Magic
My try:
Magic "is" something that can't be, which causes interest and fun to everyone.
Magic "is" something that can't be, which causes interest and fun to everyone.
"The Passion of an Amateur Card Magician"
https://bit.ly/2lXdO2O
"La pasion de un cartómago aficionado"
https://bit.ly/2kkjpjn
https://bit.ly/2lXdO2O
"La pasion de un cartómago aficionado"
https://bit.ly/2kkjpjn
- katterfelt0
- Posts: 276
- Joined: February 2nd, 2021, 2:11 pm
- Favorite Magician: Depends on the day. Today, Rick Maue.
Re: The Word Magic
.Paco Nagata wrote:My try:
Magic "is" something that can't be, which causes interest and fun to everyone.
Paco, it's not just your try, it's your success. We each must define magic for ourselves, should we feel so inclined. You did just that
Effect and method are inextricably linked.
- Paco Nagata
- Posts: 437
- Joined: July 3rd, 2019, 6:47 am
- Favorite Magician: Juan Tamariz
- Location: Madrid, Spain.
Re: The Word Magic
katterfelt0 wrote:.Paco Nagata wrote:My try:
Magic "is" something that can't be, which causes interest and fun to everyone.
Paco, it's not just your try, it's your success. We each must define magic for ourselves, should we feel so inclined. You did just that
Thanks Jim!
Teying to define MAGIC is something like trying to define LOVE.
"The Passion of an Amateur Card Magician"
https://bit.ly/2lXdO2O
"La pasion de un cartómago aficionado"
https://bit.ly/2kkjpjn
https://bit.ly/2lXdO2O
"La pasion de un cartómago aficionado"
https://bit.ly/2kkjpjn
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: July 8th, 2010, 8:55 pm
Re: The Word Magic
Magic is a class of events of which there is no possible explanation.
The single absolute truth is that we don't know.
-
- Posts: 8709
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
How does one distinguish an event as magical as opposed to any other member of that set of inexplicable events?Al Schneider wrote:Magic is a class of events of which there is no possible explanation.
- katterfelt0
- Posts: 276
- Joined: February 2nd, 2021, 2:11 pm
- Favorite Magician: Depends on the day. Today, Rick Maue.
Re: The Word Magic
Jonathan Townsend wrote:How does one distinguish an event as magical as opposed to any other member of that set of inexplicable events?Al Schneider wrote:Magic is a class of events of which there is no possible explanation.
IMHO, magic is done in a theatrical context. Other inexplicable events are outside that realm. I have that distinction in my personal definition of magic.
Effect and method are inextricably linked.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: September 2nd, 2012, 11:24 pm
Re: The Word Magic
The feeling one gets when that which one knows is impossible occurs undeniably in your presence. - Brad Henderson
An astonishing theatrical event for which there is seemingly no logical explanation and for which no rationalized explanation satisfies. - Michael Close
The aesthetic exploration of mystery.
- Max Maven
An astonishing theatrical event for which there is seemingly no logical explanation and for which no rationalized explanation satisfies. - Michael Close
The aesthetic exploration of mystery.
- Max Maven
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: July 8th, 2010, 8:55 pm
Re: The Word Magic
Communication depends on common understanding. If there is no agreement on a subject at hand, the communication between terminals is, at best, garbled. My initial question was to determine who might have something in common with my understanding of what magic is. As has been pointed out, there is no wrong answer to the question. However, the answers reveal that there is little consensus with my view. Hence, I am wasting my time here.
The single absolute truth is that we don't know.
Re: The Word Magic
Al Schneider wrote:As has been pointed out, there is no wrong answer to the question. However, the answers reveal that there is little consensus with my view. Hence, I am wasting my time here.
Fortunately, you are not wasting our time.
It is an important question. But I think its importance is proportional to one's desire to create new works.
I also think it might be more important to invest the effort to find an answer, than to be served someone else's answer. The process is also the reward.
-
- Posts: 8709
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
Putting all inexplicable phenomena into a class is ... implicitly done with the label "inexplicable". Putting magic into that class is sensible. It remains to distinguish magic from any other member of that class.
Mundus vult decipi -per Caleb Carr's story Killing Time
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: June 28th, 2019, 2:41 pm
- Favorite Magician: Michael Rubinstein
Re: The Word Magic
Magic is a sense of wonder that one feels after experiencing something that can not be explained by the laws of nature or logic.
Re: The Word Magic
Are we talking about real magic or pretend magic?
-
- Posts: 8709
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
That's a tough one. ++ for the insight Tarotist.Tarotist wrote:Are we talking about real magic or pretend magic?
Mundus vult decipi -per Caleb Carr's story Killing Time
Re: The Word Magic
Jonathan Townsend wrote:That's a tough one. ++ for the insight Tarotist.Tarotist wrote:Are we talking about real magic or pretend magic?
Actually I have been giving the matter some serious thought. As a result I have come to the conclusion that real magic does not exist. However pretend magic most certainly does. However you will find that on the Magic Cafe.
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: July 8th, 2010, 8:55 pm
Re: The Word Magic
Does anyone care how the audience defines magic?
The single absolute truth is that we don't know.
- Richard Kaufman
- Posts: 27068
- Joined: July 18th, 2001, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Theodore DeLand
- Location: Washington DC
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
It would be difficult to ascertain how they describe magic, since they are unreliable narrators.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine
-
- Posts: 8709
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
Their beliefs/expectations - yes. Their language if asked - not likely.Al Schneider wrote:Does anyone care how the audience defines magic?
-
- Posts: 8709
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
Re: The Word Magic
The notion of agency seems pretty common when folks describe magic. i.e. some agency acted such that something is what it would not have otherwise been.Richard Kaufman wrote:It would be difficult to ascertain how they describe magic, since they are unreliable narrators.