Page 1 of 1

Beyond Brookledge Article: A Clarification

Posted: July 17th, 2013, 6:45 pm
by Dustin Stinett
In my piece on Beyond Brookledge (August 2013 issue of Genii), there is a sentence regarding Jinx and Gabby; the nude models. That sentence makes it sound like the girls were unimportant. What I meant to convey was that the fact that they were nude became unimportant. Without going into a lot of detail, they are both excellent conversationalists on multiple subjects. For example, there was a fascinating and erudite conversation between Jinx and Bob Self regarding the possible unionization of models. That Jinx was naked became unremarkable.

Dustin

Re: Beyond Brookledge Article: A Clarification

Posted: July 17th, 2013, 6:49 pm
by Richard Kaufman
As long as you weren't naked, I don't think anyone had a problem with it.

Re: Beyond Brookledge Article: A Clarification

Posted: July 17th, 2013, 7:40 pm
by Dustin Stinett
There's always next year...

Re: Beyond Brookledge Article: A Clarification

Posted: July 17th, 2013, 9:18 pm
by Bill Mullins
When I saw the thread title, I was scared that Dustin was going to tell us he had misidentified the canal from which he popped.

Re: Beyond Brookledge Article: A Clarification

Posted: July 17th, 2013, 11:43 pm
by Steve Bryant
Brilliant piece, Dustin. Very cool to get all those music references.

Re: Beyond Brookledge Article: A Clarification

Posted: July 18th, 2013, 10:38 pm
by Dustin Stinett
Thanks Steve. You should consider next year. I know that you'd enjoy it!

Re: Beyond Brookledge Article: A Clarification

Posted: September 22nd, 2013, 9:15 pm
by Necromancer
Amazing article, Dustin. Thanks for letting us live vicariously through you.

Best,
Neil