Bill Mullins wrote:Edward Pungot wrote:Technically, it is his signature.
To people who collect autographs, it is not.
Exactly Bill.
Bill Mullins wrote:Edward Pungot wrote:Technically, it is his signature.
To people who collect autographs, it is not.
Tom Gilbert wrote:Bill Mullins wrote:Edward Pungot wrote:Technically, it is his signature.
To people who collect autographs, it is not.
Exactly Bill.
John Signa wrote: Different options for ordering the book include:
Brad Jeffers wrote:John Signa wrote: Different options for ordering the book include:
So the "signed" edition was only $1 more than the unsigned edition?
One volume for each template or a special section in a special edition?Brad Henderson wrote:Of course, now you need the auto pen edition to complete the set!
Andres Reynoso wrote: so it is an "official" signature even by autopen because it was officialy offered by Copperfiled.
Mark Tams wrote:I think my signed book is beautiful, regardless of how it is signed. I purchased the book . . . not necessarily the signature. The pics, layout and much of the script I am enjoying reading.
I get the collectors thang' . . . but why would someone want to return a beautiful book with lots of historical information because of "how" it was signed?
Chris Aguilar wrote:And, since it's been all silence from the Copperfield camp, can we assume that they know about and are Ok with the autopenned signatures being sold this way?
Ted M wrote:Chris Aguilar wrote: Copperfield is promoting his book project. Autograph collectors who consider the book worthless are unlikely to win sympathy from him.
Ted M wrote:> Fans don't want to feel cheated...
I don't understand who can feel cheated when they only paid an extra dollar for the "signature"?
....
Ted M wrote:I don't understand who can feel cheated when they only paid an extra dollar for the "signature"?
Ted M wrote:Does any reasonable person think they're getting a real LeBron James-signed basketball at Target for $14.99?
I think it's perfectly understandable that there are people who would want to return even a beautiful book when they place significant value on having the author's signature, and were induced to buy it based, at least in part, on the express representation that it was "autographed" by DC, and it turned out not to be, thereby depriving them of the benefit of their bargain.