Impressive tricks in Impossible, but haven't we seen lots of them before?

Discuss the latest news and rumors in the magic world.
User avatar
CraigMitchell
Posts: 1476
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Magic
Contact:

Impressive tricks in Impossible, but haven't we seen lots of them before?

Postby CraigMitchell » July 15th, 2016, 8:08 am

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/theatre/what ... but-haven/

Telegraph gives it 3/5 stars

"Overall, Impossible is less cheesy and more knowing than before and makes a virtue of its illustrious pedigree, with endless references to Houdini and to magic as an art that stretches back centuries. Yet to some extent this is also its weakness – its thrills are many, but nothing most people won’t have seen many times before."

User avatar
CraigMitchell
Posts: 1476
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Magic
Contact:

Re: Impressive tricks in Impossible, but haven't we seen lots of them before?

Postby CraigMitchell » July 20th, 2016, 8:08 am

Seems the producer of Impossible is not endearing himself to his prior performers

"Magicians who appeared in last year’s production of Impossible have accused producer Jamie Hendry of copying their acts for the show’s current run in the West End ... They have called his actions “cheap and unethical” and demanded that he remove them from the show, currently running at the Noel Coward Theatre in London ... Jamie Allan and Luis de Matos are magicians who featured in the show when it played in London last year."

https://www.thestage.co.uk/news/2016/ma ... ng-tricks/

User avatar
Q. Kumber
Posts: 1513
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Manchester, England

Re: Impressive tricks in Impossible, but haven't we seen lots of them before?

Postby Q. Kumber » August 24th, 2016, 8:19 am

Impossible at The Noel Coward Theatre, London

Not having seen any of the recent illusion shows in London or on tour, and having heard mixed reviews from people I know, I went to see Impossible which is now in its last days of a seven week run.

Being a Tuesday night, I was surprised at the size of the house, not packed but very full with a family audience.

Before the show announcements are made by Chris Cox for people to fill in a card with things they want him to do, pop the card in an envelope, and post those in a box on stage.

The show opened on time with the escape from the spiked table where the spikes are set on fire, Josephine Lee, having been strapped to the table, the sheet is pulled in front of her and with lighted back projection we see her trying to free herself before the spikes drop. They do. Is she dead? No, the cover pulled back and she is sitting on top of the spikes. Performed very quickly, no mention of the performer and I think the audience, with a moment's reflection would figure out a method.

Straight into Ben Hart telling a story about a trick performed in the Monsoon season in India. He tells what happens in the trick and then performs the trick using a regular playing card to emphasise each change. The cards transform to dust at the end, one of the few moments in the show where the audience’s surprised reactions could be felt.

(It's an interesting concept - fully describing the exact effect before performing it and worth exploring).

Ben walks upstage to be covered by a large circular red certain which comes down and when it is later raised we find Jonathan Goodwin’s Bed of Nails. Of all the performers Jonathan has the best and most convincing speaking voice. He invites a lady up from the audience and she is invited to sit in the bed of nails. The bed is lifted away leaving just one long and menacing nail protruding upwards. Jonathan lies back on it, has a block placed on it and it’s smashed in two with a sledge hammer.

When Jonathan comes on he is wearing a large watch on his right wrist. I don’t know why. Every time he moves his arm it catches the spotlight and reflects on the backdrop. At first I thought there were moths flying. It’s distracting.

Mickey Bones next a rapping, breakdancing street magician. A lady is invited up and seated at a table stage right. A £20 note is borrowed from a man in the audience which (after the lady writes down it’s serial number) is torn up and burnt with amusing tongue-in-cheek patter. The lady writes her name across a chosen card which is shuffled back, the cards sprung into the air, Mickey does a backflip and amongst all the cascading cards catches the chosen one. He then removes from his jacket a full champagne glass which he drinks. Maybe I imagined it but I thought there was a round object in the glass, like a lime. I thought, “The £20 not will be in the lime.” But I was wrong. It was found in a Crunchie that was in a box on the table. It would have been far better theatrically if it was found in the lime.

Incidentally Mickey also wore a watch that kept catching in the spotlight. I’d also like to see him do a bit more breakdancing.

Jonathan Goodwin comes on next to host the Water Tank Escape. Frankly there are far too many references to Houdini in this show. Josephine Lee is wearing a miniature camera so’s we can see what’s happening in the tank, along with a camera that is in the bottom of the tank. However once the tank is covered, and the way the projection screen is done, I don’t think anyone believes that what we are seeing is actually what is happening. After Josephine hasn’t made her escape, the curtain is pulled back revealing an empty tank and Josephine appears from the back of the theatre.

Next Chris Cox whose stage persona is a nerdy superhero who has been ingesting far too many e-numbers. His ability is to pick up on the thoughts of people by touching them directly or indirectly. His character is consistent throughout and he does a very entertaining piece where he duplicates the same outfit as selected by a lady from the audience. It’s not easy making mentalism visual and colourful and he succeeds at both.

Back to Ben Hart, finishing the first half dressed as a Victorian sideshow barker with long Sherlock style coat and carrying a cane, which really suited the character he was playing - which he plays with gusto. A paper aeroplane is thrown out to find a random audience member resulting in a lady being invited on stage to take part in a transportation illusion. I’d seen this on the ONE TV show and it looks terrific. The set looks intriguing with two large cylindrical looking birdcages and lots of Telsa looking electrical equipment. The lady is put into one cage and is transported into the other. However as she is exiting from the cage there is a bang, something ‘apparently’ has gone wrong, there is a blackout and the curtain drops for the interval. There is one word to describe this ending to the first half. ‘dreadful’. What should have been a thrilling and magical finish with a potential standing ovation is killed. Ben, who did a great job doesn’t get to take any applause. I suspect the producers were trying to mimic the Paul Daniels Iron Maiden finish that he did on live TV. Well, if so, they shouldn’t. A much better finish would be Ben producing a rose, giving it to the lady and then standing solo in just a spotlight and I'm pretty sure he would have gotten a SO.

The second half opens with Chris Cox doing the sealed message reading routine using the sealed envelopes that had been placed in the box. Cameras are used to film the reactions of audience members, who are also handed a microphone. I’ve done a Q&A routine myself and know the most important thing is the revelation of information in a way that keeps everyone interested. Chris does this exceptionally well and it was a highlight of the show. Superbly executed. Annemann would have been proud..

Sabine Van Diemen has a man and woman up on stage and proceeds to perform a version of the Selbit Sawing, except now it is man to be sawn and she uses the cameraman from the show, who unlike the rest of the stage crew (all in black) is dressed in blue jeans and a beige sweater. She plays the part as a dominatrix getting revenge for all the years females have been sawn. She did a great job but the routine did not get the gasps it should have done. More on that in a minute.

The set now changes to what appears to be an old silent movie starring Ben Hart performing the Billiard Balls. Ben appears to emerge from the movie but you are still left with the feeling he is still in it and performs a billiard ball routine. The whole piece felt like I was watching Marcel Marceau. The whole idea and setting was delightful.

Escaping upside down for a strait jacket isn’t new but the performer being set on fire while escaping is. Visually it looked amazing but the problem is the performer has to get out very quickly, so this was the shortest escape I’ve seen which does tend to diminish it’s effectiveness. The alternative is a crisp performer.

Each seat in the house had an envelope with four pieces of paper, each of which had the poster of a famous magician. We’re in to the Woody Aragon routine where pieces are torn, mixed, thrown away and with two eventually matching. While Mickey did it well, there wasn’t the reaction at the end you would expect. It is more like, “Oh, OK.”

Josephine Lee returns where there is one of those props that look like a ferris wheel with a partition in the middle and she vanishes from one side and appears on the other. Both Sabine and Josephine were refreshing additions to the otherwise all male cast but it is a pity both were doing illusions. Romany would have been an excellent choice for one of the female roles adding colour, charm and comedy.

Recent Britain’s Got Talent winner, Richard Jones, was, I presume, added to the bill as a box office attraction. How would he hold up against the other six, considerably more experienced performers? The answer is, very well indeed. His style is both quiet and engaging, contrasting well with the rest of the show. He does three routines, the first, Percy Naldrett’s Phantom Artist, cutting out the face of a celebrity chosen by an audience member. In this case it was The Queen. A boy is invited up and seated. Richard does a card printing routine where the deck transforms into perspex cards in the boy’s hands in a puff of smoke. Richard’s banter with the boy was engaging and funny. He finished with a T&R poster (poster of the show) talking about his dream of being a magician and that nothing is impossible. I’ve seen American performers do this kind of thing and it normally comes over as schmaltzy [censored]. In this case it same over with sincerity.

Jonathan Goodwin comes back with his crossbow act shooting arrows into balloons,through the stem of a flower and the edge of a sheet of newspaper, then while blindfolded bursting a balloon on his wife’s head. The frame into which the arrows landed is turned around only to find another female assistant inside and we see the arrows landed around her head.

The final spot is a laser act in almost complete darkness. I’m not sure which of the female performers was doing this spot and at one time she levitated but I’m not sure the audience even noticed.

The show concluded with the performers coming on and taking disciplined bows.

Overall the audience well got their money’s worth. The show including the interval lasted just over two and a half hours. The stage crew did a great job with all the set changes, and on the ball to collect an extending stick used by Chris Cox. Musical effects were added where needed and with spot on timing.

However the show badly needs a director who understands magic. Many of the climaxes of effects were killed by lack of pointing and timing. Performers not being given the opportunity to take their applause, and occasionally not knowing how to take applause.

User avatar
Q. Kumber
Posts: 1513
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Manchester, England

Re: Impressive tricks in Impossible, but haven't we seen lots of them before?

Postby Q. Kumber » August 25th, 2016, 4:23 am

I made an error with one of the performer's names. It is not Mickey Bones. It is Magical Bones.

Ted M
Posts: 932
Joined: January 24th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Dani DaOrtiz
Location: Madison, WI

Re: Impressive tricks in Impossible, but haven't we seen lots of them before?

Postby Ted M » August 25th, 2016, 1:18 pm

Thank you for this writeup and analysis.

Edwin Corrie
Posts: 488
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Geneva, Switzerland

Re: Impressive tricks in Impossible, but haven't we seen lots of them before?

Postby Edwin Corrie » August 26th, 2016, 4:14 am

Thank you Quentin for the detailed review. I was in London a week or so ago with my wife and younger daughter (11), who likes magic, and though it wasn’t originally planned we ended up getting last-minute tickets. I wasn’t aware of any of the controversy till now, but have to say that as a show we found it really enjoyable. Even my wife liked it, and she’s not a great fan of magic, to say the least.

Ben Hart was very impressive (we’d seen him a couple of times over here in Geneva at shows put on by the local Simply Theatre group), though I must admit that I too was a bit confused about the ending of the first half.

Magical Bones was entertaining with some good magic. I didn’t follow along with the matching posters thing because I thought it was just Howard Adams’ trick “Will the Cards Match” and I wanted to keep the little posters intact as a souvenir, but as it went on I regretted it because it clearly wasn’t quite the same procedure. I’ll have to buy Woody Aragon’s book now, but at least I have a good excuse and it’ll save me searching my library in vain to find the trick.

Richard Jones was also impressive with a good manner and stage presence. Chris Cox did some baffling material and also made it entertaining – even my wife liked it because she’s quite intrigued by mindreading (“not like all those pointless card tricks you do”). We did notice the laser levitation at the end but with the stage in darkness it seemed less mysterious than it probably should have been.

But altogether we had a very enjoyable evening and all the performers were good to watch. All of them were also very kind and approachable at the stage door afterwards when my daughter went to ask for photos with them and autographs on her poster. She loved the show and was especially thrilled to actually meet Richard Jones (BGT winner) and Ben Hart, who she’d seen over here before.

User avatar
erdnasephile
Posts: 3698
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm

Re: Impressive tricks in Impossible, but haven't we seen lots of them before?

Postby erdnasephile » August 26th, 2016, 8:24 am

I love reports like this: thank you Q and Edwin!

willhoustoun
Posts: 8
Joined: June 27th, 2013, 8:02 pm

Re: Impressive tricks in Impossible, but haven't we seen lots of them before?

Postby willhoustoun » August 29th, 2016, 7:08 am

Incase anyone is interested this piece may be pertinent to the thread...

https://www.thestage.co.uk/opinion/2016 ... -flattery/

Edwin Corrie
Posts: 488
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Geneva, Switzerland

Re: Impressive tricks in Impossible, but haven't we seen lots of them before?

Postby Edwin Corrie » August 31st, 2016, 3:11 am

It seems the dispute about the alleged theft of the laser act has been resolved:

https://www.thestage.co.uk/news/2016/magicians-act-theft-dispute-settled-with-impossible-producer/


Return to “Buzz”