Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
I am now working every night to complete the Ten Card Poker Deal book (aka THE BAMMO TEN CARD DEAL DOSSIER). With two kids in college, I have no choice. One of the topics I want to cover is how it was invented. My initial thoughts from 2005 are below. Please add your comments and criticisms. I know the original version was with a full deck, but the inventor must have worked back from the ending, so--
1. To make the problem simpler, the inventor probably reduced it to ten cards because he knew that's how the thing would end with two, 5-card hands.
2. The hands could not match, because that would be a draw, so he knew he couldn't have royal flushes, so that eliminated 4 hands.
3. For a similar reason, any straight flush would also be eliminated, so those hands were eliminated. (I'm not saying he didn't experiment here, because obviously you could have one straight flush beating another, but that means you would need a much more limited set of cards and I assume a cheater wants something he can assemble quickly.
So, he eliminates any sequence of x, x+1, x+2, x+3, x+4.
4. Because of #3, he also eliminates simple straights.
5. Flushes die for the same reasons.
6. There are only 13 Four of a kind hands, so again this makes the cards needed too rare and the winning hand too pat.
7. A no pair hand with one high card looks promising because whoever gets the high card wins, but there may be arrangements of the 10 cards which would give some other hand, so two, no pair hands with a high card in one cannot be guaranteed.
8. So that leaves the following hands as possibilities:
Full house AAA BB
Three of a kind CCC DE
Two Pairs FF GG H
One Pair II JKL
9. The ending must be that one hands beats the other there can be no ties. So the cheater takes the first two hands, a full house and 3oaK and looks at them:
AAA BB
CCC DE
A little experimentation shows that D and E are bad choices because the hands could come out:
AAA BD
CCC BE
but the cheater realizes that if the D was a B, he'd be fine.
That gives him the AAA BB CCC BE set. Now he plays with this and realizes that whoever gets the E loses and that works for a full house and 3oaK, but as he does this, he'll see the other results:
There are only three combinations of hands:
Full house beats 3ofaK
3ofaK beats Two pairs.
Two pairs beat one pair.
1. To make the problem simpler, the inventor probably reduced it to ten cards because he knew that's how the thing would end with two, 5-card hands.
2. The hands could not match, because that would be a draw, so he knew he couldn't have royal flushes, so that eliminated 4 hands.
3. For a similar reason, any straight flush would also be eliminated, so those hands were eliminated. (I'm not saying he didn't experiment here, because obviously you could have one straight flush beating another, but that means you would need a much more limited set of cards and I assume a cheater wants something he can assemble quickly.
So, he eliminates any sequence of x, x+1, x+2, x+3, x+4.
4. Because of #3, he also eliminates simple straights.
5. Flushes die for the same reasons.
6. There are only 13 Four of a kind hands, so again this makes the cards needed too rare and the winning hand too pat.
7. A no pair hand with one high card looks promising because whoever gets the high card wins, but there may be arrangements of the 10 cards which would give some other hand, so two, no pair hands with a high card in one cannot be guaranteed.
8. So that leaves the following hands as possibilities:
Full house AAA BB
Three of a kind CCC DE
Two Pairs FF GG H
One Pair II JKL
9. The ending must be that one hands beats the other there can be no ties. So the cheater takes the first two hands, a full house and 3oaK and looks at them:
AAA BB
CCC DE
A little experimentation shows that D and E are bad choices because the hands could come out:
AAA BD
CCC BE
but the cheater realizes that if the D was a B, he'd be fine.
That gives him the AAA BB CCC BE set. Now he plays with this and realizes that whoever gets the E loses and that works for a full house and 3oaK, but as he does this, he'll see the other results:
There are only three combinations of hands:
Full house beats 3ofaK
3ofaK beats Two pairs.
Two pairs beat one pair.
- Tom Frame
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Del Ray
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Bob,
Considering that you've been talking about this impending book since the latter part of the 19th century, I'm pleased as punch to hear that there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Let's hope that it's not merely a moose sporting a miner's lamp.
As I type this, I'm giving you a standing ovation for your insightful, analytical assessment of the "creator's" developmental process. Bravo!
Tom
Considering that you've been talking about this impending book since the latter part of the 19th century, I'm pleased as punch to hear that there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Let's hope that it's not merely a moose sporting a miner's lamp.
As I type this, I'm giving you a standing ovation for your insightful, analytical assessment of the "creator's" developmental process. Bravo!
Tom
- Matthew Field
- Posts: 2846
- Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Slydini
- Location: Hastings, England, UK
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Tom -- what is the moose doing in the tunnel?
Matt Field
Matt Field
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
The Moose is doing the Ten Card Poker Deal, what else would he be doing in the tunnel!
Tom is right, I've been working on this for so long, some of my notes are on stone tablets, however, last night I finished sorting all the material into about 2.5 feet of three-ring binders, so I'm ready to roll.
You can thank Tim Trono and Mike Weber for this impetus--I can't say more here, but they suggested an idea to me that is so good, I just had to finish the book.
Tom is right, I've been working on this for so long, some of my notes are on stone tablets, however, last night I finished sorting all the material into about 2.5 feet of three-ring binders, so I'm ready to roll.
You can thank Tim Trono and Mike Weber for this impetus--I can't say more here, but they suggested an idea to me that is so good, I just had to finish the book.
-
- Posts: 670
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Orlando, FL
- Contact:
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Bob, you have to get this out before people stop reading completely!
I look forward to it and I hope my contribution makes the final cut.
Jeff Pierce
I look forward to it and I hope my contribution makes the final cut.
Jeff Pierce
visit my facebook page @:
https://www.facebook.com/jeff.pierce.magic
https://www.facebook.com/jeff.pierce.magic
-
- Posts: 1188
- Joined: January 24th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Dani DaOrtiz
- Location: Madison, WI
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Woot!
Rejoice!
What next, word that Max Maven's long-anticipated book on the Gilbreath principle, Terrifying Beauty, is being readied for press as well?!
Rejoice!
What next, word that Max Maven's long-anticipated book on the Gilbreath principle, Terrifying Beauty, is being readied for press as well?!
-
- Posts: 5916
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Huntsville, AL
- Contact:
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Bob -- you describe the origins as an analytical process of elimination. Don't you think it is possible, if not even likely, that the trick came from simple noodling around with small groups of cards? Perhaps someone had occasion to pick up two hands in a deal, and when added together, those hands consisted of three triples and a single card. Our inventor played with those ten cards and realized that no matter how they were dealt, they resulted in two playable hands, but the one with the Jonah card always lost.
I realized that you've thought about the problem much more than I have (and much more than I will . . . )
And what is the origin of the term "Jonah Card"? Has it ever meant anything beyond its meaning here -- the card that makes you lose in 10 card poker? I'm reminded of the queen of spades in hearts, which we always called "the bitch" (but I see from googling that it is also called the Black Maria, which I've never heard in this context). Al Koran had a marketed effect ca. 1948 called "The Jonah Card", but from ads, it doesn't seem too related to how the term is used in 10Cpoker.
Why "Jonah"? It seems like "Judas" would make more sense -- whoever receives the card is betrayed by it. There's nothing about the story of Jonah that makes the allusion logical.
I realized that you've thought about the problem much more than I have (and much more than I will . . . )
And what is the origin of the term "Jonah Card"? Has it ever meant anything beyond its meaning here -- the card that makes you lose in 10 card poker? I'm reminded of the queen of spades in hearts, which we always called "the bitch" (but I see from googling that it is also called the Black Maria, which I've never heard in this context). Al Koran had a marketed effect ca. 1948 called "The Jonah Card", but from ads, it doesn't seem too related to how the term is used in 10Cpoker.
Why "Jonah"? It seems like "Judas" would make more sense -- whoever receives the card is betrayed by it. There's nothing about the story of Jonah that makes the allusion logical.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Ted M wrote:What next, word that Max Maven's long-anticipated book on the Gilbreath principle, Terrifying Beauty, is being readied for press as well?!
Keep the faith.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Bill Mullins wrote:Why "Jonah"? It seems like "Judas" would make more sense -- whoever receives the card is betrayed by it. There's nothing about the story of Jonah that makes the allusion logical.
"Jonah" is old nautical slang, meaning someone or something that brings bad luck. In the biblical story of Jonah, he is thus defined by his shipmates, who therefore throw him overboard -- which leads to the better known part of the tale.
-
- Posts: 1188
- Joined: January 24th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Dani DaOrtiz
- Location: Madison, WI
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Max Maven wrote:Ted M wrote:What next, word that Max Maven's long-anticipated book on the Gilbreath principle, Terrifying Beauty, is being readied for press as well?!
Keep the faith.
Yesssss!!
What a great day! My hope of seeing both these works has been rekindled! Thanks, Genii Forum!
-
- Posts: 5916
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Huntsville, AL
- Contact:
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Ah, thanks Max. Being educated like this reminds me that I have a dictionary, and I should use it from time to time. "Jonah" in this sense goes back to the 1880s in print (at least, as far as the OED and the RHHDAS know), and was so used by Kipling, among others.
But part of the question still remains. My cursory research shows that the term "Jonah card" became associated with the 10CPD ca. 1948 (Phoenix #168, Jan 1948), just before Koran released his trick of that name (in which, BTW, "Jonah" doesn't seem to connote bad luck). Is that simply coincidence? Or did Koran's trick influence the 10CPD in a way I don't understand?
But part of the question still remains. My cursory research shows that the term "Jonah card" became associated with the 10CPD ca. 1948 (Phoenix #168, Jan 1948), just before Koran released his trick of that name (in which, BTW, "Jonah" doesn't seem to connote bad luck). Is that simply coincidence? Or did Koran's trick influence the 10CPD in a way I don't understand?
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Koran was sloppy about titles (e.g., when he erroneously applied the "Princess Card" appellation to a completely different trick). Given that his marketed "Jonah Card" had no similarity of plot or method to the Ten-Card Deal, I would assume that either it was purely a coincidence or, more likely, that he'd heard the term right around the time he released his trick, and found it appealing.
Either way, I do not think it has any true connection to the terminology as commonly employed to define the "unlucky" card in the Ten-Card Poker Deal.
Either way, I do not think it has any true connection to the terminology as commonly employed to define the "unlucky" card in the Ten-Card Poker Deal.
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Gary Ouellet tried to change the tide by using "Judas" in his description of a Tony Binarelli routine. When you think about it, it's much more appropriate since not only is there betrayal, but betrayal for money. "Jonah" comes from the Biblical whale tale of throwing Jonah off the ship (he was bad luck) and into the mouth of a whale.
I have coined a new term: the Jekyll & Hyde card--a card that changes its polarity and causes either a winning or losing hand. No, it's not a double-ended or other kind of gaffed card. This is a brand new idea that will only appear in THE BAMMO TEN CARD DEAL DOSSIER.
It WILL NOT appear in the Max Maven book.
I have coined a new term: the Jekyll & Hyde card--a card that changes its polarity and causes either a winning or losing hand. No, it's not a double-ended or other kind of gaffed card. This is a brand new idea that will only appear in THE BAMMO TEN CARD DEAL DOSSIER.
It WILL NOT appear in the Max Maven book.
- Matthew Field
- Posts: 2846
- Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Slydini
- Location: Hastings, England, UK
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Very glad to hear you're finally publishing something that Max hasn't published first.
Matt Field
Matt Field
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Yes, I'm breaking new ground not only for myself but for at least 1200 other magicians.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
All we need now is Todd Karr to announce the publication date of Encyclopedia of Impromptu Magic...
Andrew
Andrew
- erdnasephile
- Posts: 4768
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
AJM wrote:All we need now is Todd Karr to announce the publication date of Encyclopedia of Impromptu Magic...
Andrew
Roger that...
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Among the lesser-known names put forward as the gamblers or magicians who brought the idea to the magic world are:
Dan E. Meyers
Johnny Lobato
Myron Long
Laurie Ireland
Of course, Vernon and Marlo have also taken credit, but if anyone has any information about the four above and their relationship to the TCD, I'd appreciate hearing about it.
My email: trickmail@cogeco.ca
In addition, maybe I should compile a list of favorite routines, so if you ahve one, let me know. I just got a big vote for Woody Aragon's routine.
Dan E. Meyers
Johnny Lobato
Myron Long
Laurie Ireland
Of course, Vernon and Marlo have also taken credit, but if anyone has any information about the four above and their relationship to the TCD, I'd appreciate hearing about it.
My email: trickmail@cogeco.ca
In addition, maybe I should compile a list of favorite routines, so if you ahve one, let me know. I just got a big vote for Woody Aragon's routine.
- Steve Bryant
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Ballantine
- Location: Bloomington IN
- Contact:
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Patrick G. Redford's 30 Card Poker (3 banks of 10) from Sqaure is excellent. It was a big hit in his lecture and different from most other routines I've seen or tried.
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Steve: yes, that is an excellent routine.
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
I need a reference from Karl Fulves' "Swindle Sheet." It's an article on Dan E. Meyers that appears on pages 90 and 91--but I don't have any other details (volume, issue, date, etc.).
If anyone can help, I would be most appreciative.
Thank you.
If anyone can help, I would be most appreciative.
Thank you.
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Reference received thank you!
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
In his Linking Ring Parade (March 2005), Tony Binarelli mentions that the Ten Card Deal principle is describe in ROYAL ROAD. I haven't been able to find it (the reference, I found the book)--maybe I just can't see it. Anyone else see it?
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
I have a hard copy of The Cardiste and in #6, March 1958, a reader writes in to ask if Rusduck has ever played with the Ten Card Deal. Does anyone have a searchable copy? If so, if you could search and let me know if anything turns up, I'd appreciate it. I'm dedicated to this project, but reading through the entire magazine may cause a comatose state.
- Richard Kaufman
- Posts: 27066
- Joined: July 18th, 2001, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Theodore DeLand
- Location: Washington DC
- Contact:
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Cardiste is on Ask Alexander.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Paging Tim Ellis: Tim please send me an email to trickmail@cogeco.ca -- I need to know the year you first marketed The Ten Card Poker deal for my reference list.
Thank you.
Bob
Thank you.
Bob
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Mark Ratekin came up with the Cardiste reference--thank you Mark. I would have replied but there is no reply button on my version of private messages.
-
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Simi Valley, CA
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
I love Tony's idea where the spectator shuffles the cards and deals them, without the magician doing anything.
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Pete, Binarelli's routine was not the first to allow this.
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Looking for any information on Dom Cervas.
- Joe Pecore
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Paul Harris
- Location: Northern Virginia
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Bob Farmer wrote:Looking for any information on Dom Cervas.
http://www.geniimagazine.com/magicpedia/Dom_Cervas
Share your knowledge on the MagicPedia wiki.
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Thank you. That's exactly what I needed.
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Any U.K. magicians out there with a complete ABRA index?
I need the year for:
Abra 2548 Poker Deal pp. 628-631.
Dr. Michael Colley has an index, but my attempts to contact him have failed.
If anyone can assist, I would be most appreciative.
I need the year for:
Abra 2548 Poker Deal pp. 628-631.
Dr. Michael Colley has an index, but my attempts to contact him have failed.
If anyone can assist, I would be most appreciative.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Bob, I think Ask Alexander allows you to search Abra.
-
- Posts: 5916
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Huntsville, AL
- Contact:
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
AAlex does include a run of Abra, but not the issue in question.
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
The mystery deepens...
- Joe Pecore
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Paul Harris
- Location: Northern Virginia
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Based on the fact that Abra started in Feb. of 1946 and was a weekly magazine, I calculate that issue no. 2548 should be in December of 1994 (if that helps any).
Share your knowledge on the MagicPedia wiki.
-
- Posts: 5916
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Huntsville, AL
- Contact:
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Use that algorithm on Genii in the pre-Kaufman era . . .
-
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Thank you all--I have the answer from several people--it's Nov. 26, 1994, so Joe was almost right and I thank him for going to all that trouble.
The initial draft of the reference list has been completed and I'm now plowing (ironic farming reference) ahead with completing the book.
The initial draft of the reference list has been completed and I'm now plowing (ironic farming reference) ahead with completing the book.
Re: Inventing The Ten Card Poker Deal
Wow, just saw this thread, read it all. And here I always assumed I has SOMETHING to do with the 10-Card Poker Deal. Doubt it now. Although I've been told that I certainly popularized it when I published my routine back in the 1960s - I think. No big deal.