Wonderball

Discuss the latest news and rumors in the magic world.
User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4257
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Wonderball

Postby mrgoat » January 17th, 2013, 8:02 am

Funniest thing I've seen for years.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeG_ahxGjIU

User avatar
CraigMitchell
Posts: 1411
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Magic
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby CraigMitchell » January 17th, 2013, 8:56 am

I'm curious ... would any layperson actually be fooled by this ?

Or is it just us magicians who believe audiences aren't going to scream "ball on a string" ?

User avatar
Chas Nigh
Posts: 162
Joined: March 24th, 2008, 10:45 pm
Location: California

Re: Wonderball

Postby Chas Nigh » January 17th, 2013, 9:46 am

The comments made my day.

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4257
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby mrgoat » January 17th, 2013, 10:05 am

Chas Nigh wrote:The comments made my day.


I missed the comments. Bloody hilarious!

Imagine being so desperately sad you have to pay someone on Fiverr.com to post fake comments on your [censored] [censored] [censored] trick.

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4257
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby mrgoat » January 17th, 2013, 10:06 am

CraigMitchell wrote:I'm curious ... would any layperson actually be fooled by this ?

Or is it just us magicians who believe audiences aren't going to scream "ball on a string" ?


You'd have to be as dead as her career to be fooled by that.

M.Lee
Posts: 194
Joined: April 7th, 2010, 12:57 pm

Re: Wonderball

Postby M.Lee » January 17th, 2013, 4:39 pm

Okito was known to do a decient job w/ it ? as did Henning & Copperfield

so if not done by T----- How the hell is it supposed to float then ?

( Its interesting how easy things are for those NOT in the arena )

WoW !! is Char really that disliked here , Where's the Love People.

Throw the lady a crumb - after all Isn't she attempting to Re-group after 25 yrs of busting her ass doing GRAND ILLUSION w/ JP - Sorry but In my book that means somthing.

The set of DVDs produced by Jonathan & Char on the Art of the Grand illusion offer some of the most Solid , Most informative ,REAL world advice to be found anywhere . a Steal at the price they sold for . ....Appreciate the memories.

Good Luck Char.

PS . Just dont' sell (?) any more large illusions.


Michael Lee

User avatar
Richard Kaufman
Posts: 23147
Joined: July 18th, 2001, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Theodore DeLand
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Richard Kaufman » January 17th, 2013, 4:59 pm

Balls float either by being on the end of stick or suspended by thread. If you hear a loud noise, then it's a hair-dryer or vacuum cleaner moter like Abbott's had for a floating balloon.

I believe the Wonderball is a version of "Astro-Sphere," and excellent floating ball ostensibly created by Tony Spina and which Tannen's sold when I was a kid--I still have mine.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine

Jonathan Townsend
Posts: 7465
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Westchester, NY
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Jonathan Townsend » January 17th, 2013, 5:02 pm

Richard Kaufman wrote:...I believe the Wonderball is a version of "Astro-Sphere," and excellent floating ball ostensibly created by Tony Spina and which Tannen's sold when I was a kid--I still have mine.


IIRC the "Astro-Sphere" and it's translucent cloth had to be rather close together due to the method.

User avatar
Dustin Stinett
Posts: 6613
Joined: July 22nd, 2001, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Sometimes
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Dustin Stinett » January 17th, 2013, 5:04 pm

Teller is currently doing a version that Penn introduces as being done with a piece of thread, which, of course, is exactly how it's done. But when you watch itand even knowing how it's doneit seems impossible. (And for those who demand "art," the ball seems to have a life, and attitude, of its own.)

So, while her work on this is less than good, it's possible that someone could make something of it.

(Oh, and did anyone notice the 13 minute video of Slydini on the same page?)

Dustin

User avatar
Richard Kaufman
Posts: 23147
Joined: July 18th, 2001, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Theodore DeLand
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Richard Kaufman » January 17th, 2013, 5:21 pm

Teller's version of the Okito Floating Ball is great. Sublime. The ball becomes a living thing.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine

PapaG
Posts: 161
Joined: March 13th, 2008, 2:57 pm

Re: Wonderball

Postby PapaG » January 17th, 2013, 5:53 pm

Dustin Stinett wrote:(Oh, and did anyone notice the 13 minute video of Slydini on the same page?)

Dustin


Stunning.

User avatar
CraigMitchell
Posts: 1411
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Magic
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby CraigMitchell » January 18th, 2013, 4:44 am

"Teller's version of the Okito Floating Ball is great. Sublime. The ball becomes a living thing."

If memory serves me correctly - Tommy Wonder had some great input when it came to objects levitating and how they need to move independently of the performer. Giving life to an inanimate object is something which Teller has clearly perfected.

User avatar
Q. Kumber
Posts: 1284
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Manchester, England

Re: Wonderball

Postby Q. Kumber » January 18th, 2013, 6:40 am

Giving life to an inanimate object is powerful mojo.

But you can look at it in different ways. Take Blackstone Jr for example (I never saw Snr).

The Floating Light Bulb and the Dancing Handkerchief. Similar methodology.

Yet in the Bulb effect Blackstone is controlling the bulb. With the handkerchief, it is an independent being with a life and mind of its own.

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4257
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby mrgoat » January 18th, 2013, 7:59 am

I think the main difference between Teller and Charlotte is that Teller is good.

JHostler
Posts: 405
Joined: September 27th, 2008, 8:34 pm

Re: Wonderball

Postby JHostler » January 18th, 2013, 10:05 am

I remain astonished that magicians insist on floating or levitating *anything* (even competently). The effect can be pretty, but never actually fools anyone of moderate intelligence. An invisible means of support is the simplest, most immediate, and - without fail - accurate explanation. Today's sophisticated audiences would likely be more impressed with the slow two-centimeter movement of a small resting object captured on time lapse video - something more subtle, with a range of explanations that can be cancelled out under proper performance conditions/constraints.

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4257
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby mrgoat » January 18th, 2013, 10:08 am

JHostler wrote:I remain astonished that magicians insist on floating or levitating *anything* (even competently).


I do a bill float and it kills. SO many times afterwards people take the note and rub it on their sleeve (as I do) trying to recreate the 'static' that I claim made it float.

I think most tricks can be deconstructed by anyone with moderate intelligence. Torn and restored card - well he must not have ripped up the card, but made us think he did. Card to wallet - he must have shoved the card in the wallet when we weren't looking. etc etc etc.

JHostler
Posts: 405
Joined: September 27th, 2008, 8:34 pm

Re: Wonderball

Postby JHostler » January 18th, 2013, 10:44 am

Response bias - similar to self-selection in open opinion/satisfaction surveys. I won't presume your bill float to "suck," but there may - just may - be a silent contingent who are neither fooled nor inclined to heckle.

My observations of most non-magician spectators never indicate much beyond polite bemusement and stifled giggling when it comes to these types of effects. (And no, I'm not referring to my personal performances - I know my weaknesses! :o)
Experience the astonishing Magnum Opossum

User avatar
Richard Kaufman
Posts: 23147
Joined: July 18th, 2001, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Theodore DeLand
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Richard Kaufman » January 18th, 2013, 10:48 am

Let's not ignore Al Schneider's ground-breaking thinking regarding the Zombie, and the separation of the ball's movements from the performer's.

Many decades ago he created the curved Zombie gimmick and wrote (I'm paraphrasing), "When the ball moves, the performer doesn't. And when the performer moves, the ball doesn't."
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine

JHostler
Posts: 405
Joined: September 27th, 2008, 8:34 pm

Re: Wonderball

Postby JHostler » January 18th, 2013, 11:19 am

I've seen some absolutely lovely zombie performances... but still don't believe they're sufficiently mystifying. Maybe my standards are just too bloody high.

That said, I REALLY like Bill Abbott's "The Thing" - precisely because nothing is actually seen. The audience's thoughts are rerouted from "something's holding it up" to "what the hell IS it?" And then they wonder about the box. And then they just give up and enjoy. Simply brilliant.

Bill McFadden
Posts: 621
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Villesville-on-the-Chesapeake

Re: Wonderball

Postby Bill McFadden » January 18th, 2013, 11:27 am

Comments: "sexy feet". Has anyone told Rex Ryan?

Chris Aguilar
Posts: 1704
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Sacramento
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Chris Aguilar » January 18th, 2013, 11:39 am

Blackstone gained great conviction with his floating bulb by taking it into the audience and floating it inches away from spectators (while simultaneously, and very convincingly spinning a hoop around it.)

I was lucky enough to see him perform it a few times (and also Darren Romeo who does it well) and it went over like gangbusters. Unlike Charlotte Pendragon's abortive attempt (failure), Blackstone really understood how to sell the levitation.

Pete McCabe
Posts: 2176
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Simi Valley, CA

Re: Wonderball

Postby Pete McCabe » January 18th, 2013, 11:45 am

I remember when David Copperfield's Flying special appeared on TV. Many of my friends and co-workers asked me about it. What did you think of it, I said. It was amazing, they all replied, and they all asked how he did it. How do you think he did it, I asked. Oh I don't know, wires? was the invariable answer.

They all loved the trick. They all knew how it was done when they thought about it. But they all loved it.

They loved it because it gave them a powerful emotional feeling to watch it. Knowing how it was done was comparatively unimportant.

This is the exact opposite of the way many magicians operate. They concern themselves totally with preventing the audience from knowing how the trick is done, and any emotional content is an afterthought.

"The magic of drama is infinitely more powerful than the magic of trickery. It is as available to the conjurer as it is to the actor. The only difference is that actors take it for granted, whereas few conjurers are even aware that it exists."
Henning Nelms

"There is a tremendous difference between even short-lived illusions and none at all. If a play fails to create any illusion, it is worthless. On the other hand, if it succeeds in creating an illusion, the fact that the spell of drama is broken with the fall of the curtain does not diminish its effect in the slightest."
Henning Nelms

User avatar
Tom Stone
Posts: 1199
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Tom Stone » January 18th, 2013, 12:28 pm

I didn't think it was possible to do something that looked worse than the Sands ripoff... You learn something new every day.

Chris Aguilar
Posts: 1704
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Sacramento
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Chris Aguilar » January 18th, 2013, 12:38 pm

Tom Stone wrote:I didn't think it was possible to do something that looked worse than the Sands ripoff... You learn something new every day.

Agreed.

Both videos are horrible, a real embarrassment.

User avatar
CraigMitchell
Posts: 1411
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Magic
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby CraigMitchell » January 18th, 2013, 3:19 pm

The first time I saw Tommy Wonder perform his zombie was believing in magic again ... it was truly beautiful.

With regards to DC's flying - those who had seen it live with me first jumped to "wires" as explanation - but then discounted that option themselves after factoring in all the "convincers" - hoop / box etc. For a live audience - those were powerful moments - as you could almost collectively hear the gasps of astonishment as he tore away so-called "solutions" as the routine progressed.

Once again - that element of beauty comes to the fore in both.

Glenn Bishop
Posts: 650
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 10:52 am

Re: Wonderball

Postby Glenn Bishop » January 19th, 2013, 12:53 pm

I like the idea and I think the idea can be worked into something.

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4257
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby mrgoat » January 19th, 2013, 1:01 pm

Glenn Bishop wrote:I like the idea and I think the idea can be worked into something.


Triumph?

User avatar
erdnasephile
Posts: 2960
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm

Re: Wonderball

Postby erdnasephile » January 19th, 2013, 2:35 pm

I found the clip uncomfortable to watch.

Same feeling I got when I saw a late middle aged man and his spouse doing a dancing cane routine at a SAM convention. The movements and music no longer fit the performers and it made me just a little sad.

That's one thing I admire about Copperfield. He has an acute sense of who he is and who the audience will accept. These have changed as he has aged, and he has made the appropriate adjustments to keep himself relevant.

keeper
Posts: 47
Joined: September 20th, 2008, 6:57 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Re: Wonderball

Postby keeper » January 19th, 2013, 3:52 pm

Sadly the only thing more uncomfortable than watching Jonathan perform without Charolette....

is watching Charolette perform without Jonathan.

They are both trying to re-invent themselves whic is never easy. It's a painful process to watch but I hope that something good comes of it for everyone.
Every day is a magical adventure!

Al D'Alfonso

User avatar
Richard Kaufman
Posts: 23147
Joined: July 18th, 2001, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Theodore DeLand
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Richard Kaufman » January 19th, 2013, 9:22 pm

I think Jonathan is doing a great job reinventing himself as a middle-aged magician with a new group of people around him. Charlotte is another story.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine

Bill Mullins
Posts: 4060
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: Wonderball

Postby Bill Mullins » January 19th, 2013, 11:11 pm

You need the Wonder Coat as well.

Glenn Bishop
Posts: 650
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 10:52 am

Re: Wonderball

Postby Glenn Bishop » January 20th, 2013, 5:05 pm

Glenn Bishop wrote:I like the idea and I think the idea can be worked into something.

mrgoat wrote:Triumph?


I still like the idea and I still think the idea can be worked into something. Like many video's I have seen the only thing I see wrong with the wonder ball video is that it is very hard to put magic in front of a TV or video camera.

As with a lot of magic on Television often it takes a good producer and TV crew that understands magic to make it look good.

I still don't see anything wrong with this trick the wonderball or the video as a demonstration of a magic trick for sale - NOT A PERFORMANCE...

However it has been my experience that there are a lot of magicians out there that seem to have no idea of the difference between just a video demonstration and a performance.

And that to me is a triumph in itself.

User avatar
Tim Ellis
Posts: 923
Joined: July 11th, 2008, 4:08 pm
Location: Victoria
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Tim Ellis » January 20th, 2013, 6:30 pm

It does appear that the WONDERBALL is simply ASTROSPHERE without the cloth. Another backward step in the "reimagining" of existing effects that so many people seem to do nowadays.

Once you add the WONDERCOAT you are getting closer to the practical method that already exists with ASTROSPHERE.

Anthony Vinson
Posts: 177
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 12:34 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: Wonderball

Postby Anthony Vinson » January 21st, 2013, 6:42 am

So, what's up with the porn soundtracks on the videos? Seriously. I'm neither casting aspersions nor drawing inferences, but the soundtracks serve only to illuminate the silliness of the actual videos. It's almost parody.

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4257
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby mrgoat » January 21st, 2013, 7:06 am

Glenn Bishop wrote:I still don't see anything wrong with this trick the wonderball or the video as a demonstration of a magic trick for sale


That doesn't surprise me at all.

Jonathan Townsend
Posts: 7465
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Westchester, NY
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Jonathan Townsend » January 21st, 2013, 7:55 am

Tim, IIRC the loop predates Astro-Sphere. IMHO the semitranspareant cloth for a Zombie type floating ball routione is it's claim to novelty.

Glenn Bishop
Posts: 650
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 10:52 am

Re: Wonderball

Postby Glenn Bishop » January 21st, 2013, 10:49 am

Considering how many magicicians have done just an OK job with the zombie ball at conventions. Doing music dove acts.

I could see this wonderball as part of a show in a banquet hall a night club or a fund raiser full evening magic show. With the right lighting, costume and music.

However most of the floating ball and zombie routines and dancing cane routines I have seen often in my opinion are way to long.

In my opinion the longer a object floats the less magicial in my opinion it looks to the audience.

Tom Moore
Posts: 337
Joined: February 7th, 2012, 6:45 pm
Location: Europe
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby Tom Moore » January 21st, 2013, 11:55 am

I to could see it in all those different show settings, unlike you though, i can't see an audience actually fooled by it since it works EXACTLY how their first (cliched) though suggests it works and because it's the core method at fault there's nothing you can do to disprove it. Astrosphere was only deceptive because zombie had become so cliched that audiences saw the same effect but were so busy looking for a zombie gimmick that they didn't have chance to get too critical about the effect; it was a sucker-effect-by-proxy almost.

If you're going to go to all the hassle of putting on a special coat to do the trick you might as well just use a normal okito style hook-up and have a much stronger routine that doesn't work specifically how audiences think it would with lots of scope for disprovers.

If your background is that much of a problem on stage then you're using the wrong magic ingredient; i've used a wide variety of material to the extent that i'm happy i could routine something in to just about any backdrop available on any stage / performing space.
"Ingenious" - Ben Brantley: New York Times

thomasmoorecreative

Glenn Bishop
Posts: 650
Joined: March 14th, 2008, 10:52 am

Re: Wonderball

Postby Glenn Bishop » January 21st, 2013, 12:48 pm

Well Tom I guess we have a different opinion on floating an object and theater. I have seen people do the zombie ball and all there is to fool people is a magician moving a ball around on a stick. And it looks like they are moving a ball on a stick and the stick is hidden in a cloth.

Then there are people like Mr. Foster and Al Schneider who lift the routine above and make it a magic miracle.

Back when my sister did magic this is the kind of trick she would do - I could see my sister in a gown that was desined for doing this trick and I could see her making it work.

The method is only a small part of the routine and in my opinion the method is not perfect - as with a lot of magic out there the method is not perfect - however add theater and the right length and routine - plus costume and music.

If I remember right both Okito and Fu Manchu (David Okito's son) took the costume, stage setting and music into consideration when doing the floating ball. If my sister were still doing magic our family would do the same with the wonder ball, the zombie ball or any other floating effect.

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4257
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Wonderball

Postby mrgoat » January 21st, 2013, 1:24 pm

Not sure how adding a stupid coat and some music will stop an audience realise they are just seeing a ball on a thread. Could you elaborate on this, preferably with some video examples of how music and costume stop a bad trick with a bad method being bad?

Thanks.


Return to “Buzz”