M.Lee wrote:Here we go again ! appears the only one who had the resources to do somthing about the masked Idiot was Copperfield- in a nut shell he didn't !
and i really dont understand exactly why , as it very well could have been a precedent for Events of this nature as were now seeing again.
So everyone doing a split fan could have been sued by Cardini or (as there is evideced that someone prior to Cardini inventing the split fan.
OR Everyone who does a subtrunk based on speed should be sued by either S&Roy the Pendragons based on the Cloth work ?
What if this fellow Bakerdy decided to do the rose effect but gives p&T credit for refining the effect, as J.Sheridan believes its methology's been around and was documented in print .
Did PT Selbit ever win his court cases ? re. protecting the sawing.. ..Im not sure but do knowe that it "tapped ' him out inancially ! This could be a rough and long haul.
mrgoat wrote:Legally, as I understand it, in the US you HAVE to persue all cases of copyright infringement or you lose that copyright.
M.Lee wrote:...as it very well could have been a precedent for Events of this nature as were now seeing again.
mrgoat wrote: Teller has copyrighted this effect. ...
El Mystico wrote:Porn involved?
Did one side involve mrgoat in their legal team?