Reflecting on psycho misdirection I did not understand some things. With a large audience, principle is clear. It is in memory.
1) How did 2 Berglas effect on the video Mark Paul? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdXIVQ-а&
In one case it was on TV in the other - cards lay on the table and throughout the video we can see them. Mark does not touch the cards. Card at the number without any manipulation.
2) There is a question about installing a video Berglas effect on EMC by Lu Chen. I have two explanations - either something happened behind the camera or it force card and number on roses. Psychological misdirection on a chair behind a rope does not work.
3) In all the stories of Berglas effect David did not touch the cards. In one of these he give cards to the viewer(The Mentalist who did not believe) before in his hands and asked to name the card\number and the top \ bottom. Then he cried out that this can not be, because the cards was in his hands. Card at the number. In other story cards were in the hands of the statue of the Buddha and the viewer was asked to take the card and see. In the other story cards were in the car, etc. etc. Are all these people really do not remember that David touched the deck after they called the card and number?