Triumph

Discuss your favorite close-up tricks and methods.

Postby Kent Gunn » 03/16/09 04:13 PM

Now Chris, you're cheating. We've had this discussion before in another place.

I do like the breadth of your hint though!!!! That ain't helpin' anybody.

Nation, nation, nation !!!
Kent Gunn
 
Posts: 579
Joined: 05/15/08 02:05 PM
Location: Florida

Postby AJM » 03/16/09 06:29 PM

<------
User avatar
AJM
 
Posts: 756
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Scotland

Postby Steve Hook » 03/16/09 07:29 PM

Very nice, Kent! Love the touches, especially the fan half-way through.

It's like you constructed it ala Agatha Christie working backwards, one part negating the previous, until the whole thing is seamless.

One question: Did you already have that cut at the end or did you come up with it to specifically accomplish what it does for this routine?

Props, dude. - Steve H
Steve Hook
 
Posts: 769
Joined: 10/21/08 11:50 AM
Location: North Carolina, USA

Postby Richard Kaufman » 03/16/09 07:54 PM

Kent, you should definitely let me publish it in Genii. :)

Re the earlier comments about gimmicked cards, I've heard that Grant's "Cheek to Cheek" was reinvention of an earlier method of Arthur Finley's. I can't remember if it uses double-faced or double-backed cards. Must be double-backed.

Longitudinally split double-face/double-backed cards would allow for the fans and spreads, but if Kent says he ain't usin' no gimmicked cards, we gots to believe him.

Looks great.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine
User avatar
Richard Kaufman
 
Posts: 20939
Joined: 07/18/01 12:00 PM
Location: Washington DC

Postby Curtis Kam » 03/16/09 08:10 PM

Hey, hold on there--is there any truth to the rumor that the secret to this devious Triumph will only be revealed to the next ten people who sign up for the Golden Gate Gathering?
Curtis Kam
 
Posts: 456
Joined: 01/18/08 01:00 PM
Location: Waikiki

Postby Leonard Hevia » 03/16/09 08:26 PM

That was beautiful Kent. I can see a Kent Gunn DVD out there--with a tutorial on the Free Turn Pass...

Master Kam--you're disciples eagerly await for Palms of Steel 1 on disc...
Leonard Hevia
 
Posts: 923
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Gaithersburg, Md.

Postby Kent Gunn » 03/16/09 08:38 PM

Richard,

If you'd like to have that for Genii, nothing on earth would make me prouder.

If nothing else it would quell those who think it uses gaffs.

Kent
Last edited by Kent Gunn on 03/16/09 08:41 PM, edited 0 times in total.
Reason: Genii??
Kent Gunn
 
Posts: 579
Joined: 05/15/08 02:05 PM
Location: Florida

Postby Tom Frame » 03/16/09 08:38 PM

Wow! That's terrific, Kent!
Tom Frame
 
Posts: 866
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: San Francisco

Postby Richard Kaufman » 03/16/09 09:02 PM

Great, Kent! Make a flick of the explanation. I can have Acer download it from a site you post it to, or you can send a DVD. Either way.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine
User avatar
Richard Kaufman
 
Posts: 20939
Joined: 07/18/01 12:00 PM
Location: Washington DC

Postby Chris Aguilar » 03/16/09 09:03 PM

Kent Gunn wrote:Now Chris, you're cheating. We've had this discussion before in another place.

I do like the breadth of your hint though!!!! That ain't helpin' anybody.

Nation, nation, nation !!!
Nebulous hints are best I think (here at least). Let people enjoy being fooled until it can get published in Genii. :)
Chris Aguilar
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Sacramento

Postby Joe Pecore » 03/16/09 09:23 PM

Kent Gunn wrote:Is anybody out there doing Triumph quite like this?
KG

I will be now. Very sly! Great job.
Share your knowledge on the MagicPedia wiki.
User avatar
Joe Pecore
 
Posts: 1754
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Northern Virginia

Postby Kent Gunn » 03/16/09 09:54 PM

Darn it, should've read Curtis' posting first.

Those who attend the GGG, I will certainly tip the routine there. I don't know what kind of lead time a magazine like Genii has, but I doubt anything will get out before June.

RK, I'll have the wife shoot the explanation this weekend and I'll post it. You have my email address, let me know Acer's youtube user name and we're in their, like swimwear.

KG
Kent Gunn
 
Posts: 579
Joined: 05/15/08 02:05 PM
Location: Florida

Postby erlandish » 03/16/09 10:11 PM

Richard Kaufman wrote:Longitudinally split double-face/double-backed cards would allow for the fans and spreads, but if Kent says he ain't usin' no gimmicked cards, we gots to believe him.

Looks great.


A method presented itself pretty quickly based on what's in the video. So, there's at least one way of doing this ungimmicked -- two, if I've guessed incorrectly on the method Kent is actually using.
erlandish
 
Posts: 56
Joined: 03/13/08 07:18 PM

Postby Alpen » 03/16/09 10:18 PM

This looks like it uses a bank of faced cards, and if so, I have seen it in print before.

Alpen
Alpen
 
Posts: 104
Joined: 06/05/08 01:44 PM

Postby Alpen » 03/16/09 10:51 PM

I received this from Kent :

Alpen,

Since you're so free with methods, not of your own devising, where have you seen this in print? I assure you, even though I read a lot of magic books, I can keep my own stuff straight from the works of others.

I do hope you weren't intimating I stole this thing.

Let me know.

KG


Just wanted to clarify that I didn't imply that Kent stole anything (hence my use of the words "if so,") I was just trying to contribute to the accuracy of magic literature and proper crediting. I was trying to answer Kent's original question asking if anyone was doing triumph like the one he posted a video of, and the answer is, yes.

In fact, the (excellent) routine using faced cards that I was referring to was published in the November 2007 issue of Genii Magazine, by Jared Kopf, called An Open Display of Triumph.


Thanks,

Alpen
Alpen
 
Posts: 104
Joined: 06/05/08 01:44 PM

Postby Steve Bryant » 03/16/09 11:06 PM

Having recently enjoyed Kent's Fun Shop Cups and Balls in Las Vegas and now this equally offbeat version of Triumph, I find myself enjoying his patter as much as his out of the box methods. Most amusing! I am a fan.
User avatar
Steve Bryant
 
Posts: 1679
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Bloomington IN

Postby Steve Hook » 03/16/09 11:59 PM

Alpen: No one asked you to tip anything. Sheesh. What a dork.
Steve Hook
 
Posts: 769
Joined: 10/21/08 11:50 AM
Location: North Carolina, USA

Postby Richard Kaufman » 03/17/09 12:06 AM

Alpen is not a dork, he was simply responding to Kent's question.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine
User avatar
Richard Kaufman
 
Posts: 20939
Joined: 07/18/01 12:00 PM
Location: Washington DC

Postby Steve Hook » 03/17/09 12:30 AM

When Kent asked "Is anybody out there doing Triumph quite like this?", he did not also ask, "Would someone please post my method for this version of 'Triumph'?"

Online magic "communities": The best of times and the worst of times.

Re the former: Thanks for posting that link to your routine, Kent.
Steve Hook
 
Posts: 769
Joined: 10/21/08 11:50 AM
Location: North Carolina, USA

Postby Kent Gunn » 03/17/09 12:31 AM

Alpen and I swapped PMs. He didn't give the whole story. Nor did he need to. I asked a question at the beginning of this thing. He answered it.

After my smarmy pm, he explained his intent, which was good. I wrote back. He and I are now the best of chums.

As the king of being a jerk and regretting it later. (See multiple examples with some quasi-luminaries on this board) I'm adopted a pm 'em and see attitude. The result . . . I have several new friends instead of people who want to kill my sarcastic arse.

I haven't dug up the Genii reference he quotes. My sources were not to be found in the pages of Genii. Hopefully the trick will magically appear there nonetheless.

My sources were:

Goodlette Dodson's "Exhibition Card Fans" and . . . of course,

Vernon's work starting on pp 32 of "Stars of Magic"

Alpen answered my question. The terseness of his response led me astray.

I'm good.
Kent Gunn
 
Posts: 579
Joined: 05/15/08 02:05 PM
Location: Florida

Postby Alpen » 03/17/09 12:56 AM

Steve,

When someone posts a video, with no explanation, asking questions pertaining to originality, how can anyone answer the question or provide insight without supposing a method? If you have a way of doing this, please let us all know (and before the suggestion of a PM, this question was asked on a public thread, so a public answer isn't out of order.)

My post indicated what I thought was happening ("This looks like...") and in the case that my assumption was correct ("if so...") I tried to answer the original question. I wasn't tipping Kent's method, becuase frankly, using faced cards in a Triumph routine is not original with him. It has been published before, and I was merely pointing that out. If Kent was using an original method that hadn't been published before, and I tipped it on the forum, I'd understand your point. In this case, you don't have one.

Alpen
Alpen
 
Posts: 104
Joined: 06/05/08 01:44 PM

Postby Steve Hook » 03/17/09 04:26 AM

Alpen,

You sound like a Harry Nilsson wannabe.

Steve H

ps: We both have a point to make, we just don't agree. Like I said before, "Sheesh........"
Steve Hook
 
Posts: 769
Joined: 10/21/08 11:50 AM
Location: North Carolina, USA

Postby Jonathan Townsend » 03/17/09 07:54 AM

Richard Kaufman wrote:Alpen is not a dork, he was simply responding to Kent's question.


in public.
Jonathan Townsend
 
Posts: 6764
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Westchester, NY

Postby El Mystico » 03/17/09 08:46 AM

I have a vague memory that, a while back, Richard said he was happy for people to post their guesses to how effects were done on this forum. Do I remember right?
El Mystico
 
Posts: 890
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Leamington Spa

Postby Richard Kaufman » 03/17/09 09:27 AM

What the heck is wrong with responding "in public"? This is a forum for magicians. Please don't give me any baloney about exposure here.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine
User avatar
Richard Kaufman
 
Posts: 20939
Joined: 07/18/01 12:00 PM
Location: Washington DC

Postby Jonathan Townsend » 03/17/09 09:32 AM

El Mystico wrote:I have a vague memory that, a while back, Richard said he was happy for people to post their guesses to how effects were done on this forum. Do I remember right?


Remember the fun about half rimmed coin shells a while ago?

IMHO there's not usually a great need to openly discuss the method for someone's trick online in such plain language as to spoil the fun for others who are watching it and wondering. We have private messages.
Jonathan Townsend
 
Posts: 6764
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Westchester, NY

Postby Richard Kaufman » 03/17/09 12:29 PM

No, Jonathan, we discuss method here with NO problem. We are not ruining anyone's fun.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine
User avatar
Richard Kaufman
 
Posts: 20939
Joined: 07/18/01 12:00 PM
Location: Washington DC

Postby Tortuga » 03/17/09 04:01 PM

Chris's comment about a hint being in the works of Darwin Ortiz gave me the solution. I actually do the routine similarly to the Ortiz published method, but started out with a routine out of one of Dan Fleshman's books and added the nice fan finesse of Darwin's. That is, if I have the method correct. Mr. Gunn's routine begins with the cards in the 'requisite' situation as they sit on the table at the beginning. He also takes the shuffle to the table in lieu of the in-the-hands faro that I do. The genius of the routine to me is that Kent does exactly what he purports to be doing and nullifies all of the expected ruses. For those who are interested, the reference for the Fleshman publication is, 'The Very Best, Yet!' subtitled, Commercial Close-Up and Stand-Up Magic by Dan Fleshman. The routine is credited to Steve Payton of Kansas City, MO and is on Pp. 13 and is called 'Steve Payton's In Hand Triumph. Reads remarkably similar to Darwin's routine. Dan's book was published in 1990 and Darwin's in 2002, although the routine might be much older.
It's never crowded on the extra mile.....
Tortuga
 
Posts: 76
Joined: 04/04/08 12:55 PM
Location: Missouri

Postby Mike Rozek » 03/17/09 04:07 PM

Tortuga, If I'm interpreting the video correctly, Kent's initial setup differs slightly (pun intended) from the Ortiz routine, in a way that makes the routine and initial display much more deceptive.

Incidentally, if I'm correct about the initial state of the deck, there is an odd shift I've been working on for quite a while that brings a shuffled, in-use deck to the starting position for this routine quickly and invisibly. In other words, I think I just found a use for a move that didn't yet have a home:)
Mike Rozek
 
Posts: 56
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Norwalk, CA

Postby Joe Pecore » 03/17/09 04:40 PM

Alpen wrote: In fact, the (excellent) routine using faced cards that I was referring to was published in the November 2007 issue of Genii Magazine, by Jared Kopf, called An Open Display of Triumph.


Just glanced at that issue, it does look like there could be similarities.
Share your knowledge on the MagicPedia wiki.
User avatar
Joe Pecore
 
Posts: 1754
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Northern Virginia

Postby Tortuga » 03/17/09 05:47 PM

Mike, you are correct. The starting condition of the pack is 'similar' to Ortiz' situation, but different. At least that is if I'm correct in my assumptions. What I like about Kent's work is that it 'amplifies' the strength of the Ortiz display. When I read Ortiz' book I immediately took advantage of the seemingly guileless fan display and incorporated it into the routine that I had learned from Fleshman's book. What Kent has done, I think, is to take that idea and massage it into what you see now, which is about the cleanest, seemingly moveless Triumph that I can recall. He gets a finish that looks to only be possible with gaffs.

I like his routine a lot!

And finally, it can be done all in the hands and still be effective, but the table spread and the spread of the two packets prior to shuffling is just too juicy to not use.
It's never crowded on the extra mile.....
Tortuga
 
Posts: 76
Joined: 04/04/08 12:55 PM
Location: Missouri

Postby Kent Gunn » 03/17/09 08:01 PM

Tortuga,

Actually, with a one-handed display in each hand, it looks better in the hands. It is NOT 100% repeatable (by me) so I shot the version I can do. Hopefully RK will give enough space in Genii to explain both handlings and its antecedant:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_oGxY1zgfA
Kent Gunn
 
Posts: 579
Joined: 05/15/08 02:05 PM
Location: Florida

Postby Jared Kopf » 03/23/09 11:15 PM

Ah, youtube, wonder of wonders . . .

Jared
Jared Kopf
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 12/31/08 05:58 PM

Postby Brad Henderson » 03/24/09 01:34 AM

Seems to me to be an overhandled version of Jared's Triumph. Watched a video of Jared doing it this weekend. So much cleaner , clearer, and more open. Kent is running way too fast when no one is chasing him.

And Jared's version can be adapted to an in the hands Triumph (which I have developed/used), though for cleanliness and naturalness you cannot beat Jared's original handling.

This isn't even a step sidewise, it's a giant "mother may I" step backwards.

Brad Henderson
Brad Henderson
 
Posts: 2513
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: austin, tx

Postby Steve Hook » 03/24/09 02:51 AM

Brad Henderson wrote:Seems to me to be an overhandled version of Jared's Triumph...
This isn't even a step sidewise, it's a giant "mother may I" step backwards.


And yet, many here stepped forward to express that they enjoyed it, with nary any noxious negativism, young Brad.
Steve Hook
 
Posts: 769
Joined: 10/21/08 11:50 AM
Location: North Carolina, USA

Postby Brad Henderson » 03/24/09 03:58 AM

Steve Hook wrote:
Brad Henderson wrote:Seems to me to be an overhandled version of Jared's Triumph...
This isn't even a step sidewise, it's a giant "mother may I" step backwards.


And yet, many here stepped forward to express that they enjoyed it, with nary any noxious negativism, young Brad.



Which is why so much magic remains derivative and hackneyed, Old Steve.
Last edited by Brad Henderson on 03/24/09 04:02 AM, edited 0 times in total.
Reason: Where does the circle start and who has the cracker?
Brad Henderson
 
Posts: 2513
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: austin, tx

Postby El Mystico » 03/24/09 05:05 AM

For me, this thread has really brought home the truth of the old saying about hiding stuff in print. Kent's effect fooled me completely, because I'd merely glanced at Jared's handling in the magazine without thinking about it. After seeing Kent's video, I went back to look properly at the write up of Jared's handling. And I wasn't the only one.
mind you, I'll continue with my current handling of this effect - but it was a pleasant diversion.
El Mystico
 
Posts: 890
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: Leamington Spa

Postby Kent Gunn » 03/24/09 04:06 PM

Brad Henderson wrote:Seems to me to be an overhandled version of Jared's Triumph. Watched a video of Jared doing it this weekend. So much cleaner , clearer, and more open. Kent is running way too fast when no one is chasing him.

And Jared's version can be adapted to an in the hands Triumph (which I have developed/used), though for cleanliness and naturalness you cannot beat Jared's original handling.

This isn't even a step sidewise, it's a giant "mother may I" step backwards.

Brad Henderson


Brad,

Your dismissive comments were mean-spirted. I like that. I hope you have a sense of humor to match your arrogance.

I'm in my fifties, I weigh nearly 300 pounds. I don't ever run. The last person who chased me, I sat on 'em.

I haven't seen Jared's version. I'm sure it's lovely. I haven't seen the write-up in Genii. The entire magic universe does not revolve around the body of work you're familar with.

I've been toying with my version for a few years. I think the basic idea has been around longer than anyone involved in this discussion. (Unless we can get Harry Lorayne to chime in!!)

Precedence not being all that darned important, I will share my source of inspiration. Expert Card Technique . . . the reverses chapter. I'm pretty sure that was published before Jared came up with his version.

Your assumption that one routine, you happened to be familiar with, was my inspiration is presumptuous, to say the least. I'm not terribly well-read when it comes to magic periodicals. Genii, although world-renowned, does have an immense amount of card work in it's storied pages. Nobody is familiar with that entire body of work.

I chose to post the handling I use on YouTube so world-renowned experts, like yourself, could pontificate and show the rest of us poor amatuers how under-educated and mis-informed we all are.

Actually I'm glad you don't like the handling I put on youtube. It re-inforces that differences of opinion are good things. The version you so despise was concocted as a piece of entertainment for magicians. You were not entertained. For you I failed. It was supposed to be funny too. You didn't laugh.

I do realize you're a full-time professional magician Brad. I know you've released some popular effects for the magic community. In the grand scheme of things that may give your opinions some gravis, in your eyes; I would've hoped success allowed you some modesty and the good grace to not be so quick to jump to conclusions. You pontificate where you should simply remain mute.

I have exactly the same failings.
Kent Gunn
 
Posts: 579
Joined: 05/15/08 02:05 PM
Location: Florida

Postby Brad Henderson » 03/24/09 04:37 PM

Magicians act like little girls. We have that problem here locally. You make a comment about a "thing", and the person associated with that "thing" takes it as a personal affront - like saying they had bad breath or murdered small children.

The rule many follow is that the person who gets the idea into print first (ethically) gets the credit. Submarine sailors aside (inside joke) it ceases to matter how long someone else may have been doing it. The new work will be compared with the one established in the printed record - and by that measure, Kent's trick seems an overhandled version of Jared's Triumph.

I think the tone of some of these posts resulted from the magic lecturer classic ruse: "So, did any of you guys see the switch?" format the thread seemed to take.

Most people just smile and keep their hands in their lap and the magician thinks he fooled everyone with a stripper deck. He didn't. We just didn't care enough to raise our hands.

You asked if someone was doing something similar. The answers is "yes." And, as many have commented on the merits of your handling as it related to others, I feel it reasonable to continue that line of criticism.

You can spend your life learning every handling of every trick out there - or you can choose to invest your time with the best of what is available.

When it comes to Triumph's of this ilk, Jared's routine is cleaner, clearer, and more magical. Kent's has extraneous moves that do nothing but point to the method. If that's what you want - go for it. If you want something that is far more natural yet uses the same concepts, look up Jared's.

Or don't.

Not everyone is a thirsty horse.

Brad Henderson
Brad Henderson
 
Posts: 2513
Joined: 01/17/08 01:00 PM
Location: austin, tx

Postby Richard Kaufman » 03/24/09 04:50 PM

It's my turn to curtsey.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine
User avatar
Richard Kaufman
 
Posts: 20939
Joined: 07/18/01 12:00 PM
Location: Washington DC

Next

Return to Close-Up Magic