Hello,
This is a request to our French readers. I am seeking a couple of paragraphs from the French version of the book "Profiles of the Future" first edition.
I am working on a short essay about Clarke's position on the topic and notion of magic.
The well known quote about "sufficiently advanced technology" was introduced to the book as a footnote in the second edition in English in response to his finding that the French edition listed as Second Law his line about advancing the realm of the possible. I would like to see this line from the French edition about his second law in context.
Thanks in advance,
Jon
Perhaps as a show of gratitude I could learn a proper Tourniquet coin pass if shown what should be happening. Still at a loss when studying the Robert-Houdin description.
A. C. Clarke on magic - en Francais - m'aidez
-
- Posts: 8704
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5913
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Huntsville, AL
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 8704
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
Re: A. C. Clarke on magic - en Francais - m'aidez
Thanks Bill,
I'll probably have to get the 1967 speech reference from somewhere as well.
I have the hardbacks of the three editions of the book in English. In them I've put postits where he mentions the notion of magic. The third edition, where he got the original text scanned in to work from rather than ammend by way of footnotes and maginalia, has been a tougher read to check the changes before stating an opinion. So far he seems stay with "obvious violation of the laws of physics".
Still like to get the context of the French addition/edition :)
Jon
I'll probably have to get the 1967 speech reference from somewhere as well.
I have the hardbacks of the three editions of the book in English. In them I've put postits where he mentions the notion of magic. The third edition, where he got the original text scanned in to work from rather than ammend by way of footnotes and maginalia, has been a tougher read to check the changes before stating an opinion. So far he seems stay with "obvious violation of the laws of physics".
Still like to get the context of the French addition/edition :)
Jon