The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
http://youtu.be/wksAZSAccvQ
Unlike you professional-types, I struggle to find my magical voice.
This is the first time I have a full script, edited with some attempt at tying this all together into a presentation that doesn't involve a rambling tirade, any swear words nor my normal level of intensity.
Feedback gloriously accepted.
KG
Unlike you professional-types, I struggle to find my magical voice.
This is the first time I have a full script, edited with some attempt at tying this all together into a presentation that doesn't involve a rambling tirade, any swear words nor my normal level of intensity.
Feedback gloriously accepted.
KG
-
- Posts: 2102
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Providence, Utah
- Contact:
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Really a nice "nostalgic" presentation. Fooled me a bunch of times! I've sent a link to it to a friend of Marvin's, so maybe he'll see this tribute!
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: December 9th, 2010, 11:08 pm
- Location: southern California
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
thank you, i enjoyed that. the blue ball vanish from under the cup was very nice
Frank Quiroz
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Kent,
I like the slow and deliberate presentation. No fast moves. No banging on cups.
Cups and balls is a tough number to pull off on video due to the nature of the medium. You succeeded. Well done. Technique has improved vastly in this presentation.
Jim
I like the slow and deliberate presentation. No fast moves. No banging on cups.
Cups and balls is a tough number to pull off on video due to the nature of the medium. You succeeded. Well done. Technique has improved vastly in this presentation.
Jim
- Steve Bryant
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Ballantine
- Location: Bloomington IN
- Contact:
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Neat!
In previous versions I was laughing so hard at flights of language I figured it was easy to fool me. Have no clue how you fooled me so often with this version.
In previous versions I was laughing so hard at flights of language I figured it was easy to fool me. Have no clue how you fooled me so often with this version.
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
A former denizen here left me this comment on youtube.
You asked for comments on your work here on the Genii Forum. However, since I consider that dreadful place to be a site where the blind leads the blind I shall comment here.
Your technique is good and there is nothing wrong with the routine itself. Alas, you TALK FAR TOO MUCH. You badly need to cut the yap. And the slow and deliberate pace that has been praised elsewhere is deadly boring. I do commend you for elimating the profanity in the previous version so there is still hope for you.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
I was starting to miss the old codger. I'm better now.
You asked for comments on your work here on the Genii Forum. However, since I consider that dreadful place to be a site where the blind leads the blind I shall comment here.
Your technique is good and there is nothing wrong with the routine itself. Alas, you TALK FAR TOO MUCH. You badly need to cut the yap. And the slow and deliberate pace that has been praised elsewhere is deadly boring. I do commend you for elimating the profanity in the previous version so there is still hope for you.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
I was starting to miss the old codger. I'm better now.
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: January 10th, 2011, 3:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Your technique, as per usual, is excellent. Perhaps I'm in the minority here but I rather miss the salty language. That's the Kent we all know and love... well, that's the Kent we all know. Let's just leave it at that.
Steven Keyl - Magic Book Report
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Richard,
Thanks for the connection to the magicians in Utah, land of my birth.
James, thank you for the feedback.
Steve's, the florid language version is always at my beck and call.
Frank, that blue ball thing is a favorite of mine too. I'm happy I finally learned to communicate it's singularity.
To all that watched it in various incarnations, live and on-line, thank you. This trick has taught me more about magic than anything else.
KG
Thanks for the connection to the magicians in Utah, land of my birth.
James, thank you for the feedback.
Steve's, the florid language version is always at my beck and call.
Frank, that blue ball thing is a favorite of mine too. I'm happy I finally learned to communicate it's singularity.
To all that watched it in various incarnations, live and on-line, thank you. This trick has taught me more about magic than anything else.
KG
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Wonderful wonderful wonderful
x
x
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: July 13th, 2010, 7:33 am
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Brett Sherwood's Silver Engraved! Sorry, I missed the routine.
KIdding, beautifully done.
KIdding, beautifully done.
- CraigOusterling
- Posts: 98
- Joined: November 10th, 2009, 5:11 pm
- Favorite Magician: All the dead ones.
- Location: moved to: Orlando, FL
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
I've never seen you do a G rated version before! Nice! I'm happy to see you still using that wand too, gives me the warm fuzzies.
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Craig,
I have two wands made by friends of mine. Yours and Mr. Fenton's wand trade off. I like them both and try not to play favorites.
Only one set of cups though.
I have two wands made by friends of mine. Yours and Mr. Fenton's wand trade off. I like them both and try not to play favorites.
Only one set of cups though.
- Gordon Meyer
- Posts: 334
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Uri
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Hi, Kent - Thanks for posting this. I worked at The Fun Shop for about 10 years (starting in 1977). Sold many a set of Cups and Balls over the magic counter in the back. It was a real treat for me to hear you speak fondly of the place, albeit years before I was going there myself. I like your routine a lot.
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Gordon,
The Fun Shop was the first magic shop I was welcome to hang out in. Buma's shop in SF was not welcoming to snot-nosed-brats.
I only remember Marvin as the proprietor. Was he still there during your tenure?
The Fun Shop was the first magic shop I was welcome to hang out in. Buma's shop in SF was not welcoming to snot-nosed-brats.
I only remember Marvin as the proprietor. Was he still there during your tenure?
- Gordon Meyer
- Posts: 334
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Favorite Magician: Uri
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Terry Arnell (R.I.P.) was the owner during my tenure. Not only was he great at magic, he was also an acolyte of Ed Parker (founder of American Kenpo Karate). Terry used to tell great stories about sparring with Elvis Presley and Bruce Lee.
-
- Posts: 8709
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Westchester, NY
- Contact:
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
@Kent, that blue ball vanish may setup well with the scotty york X in terms of getting ahead with the magic so the performer can put more effort behind his presentation. Final load as method?
Mundus vult decipi -per Caleb Carr's story Killing Time
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Gordon,
I did know Terry. I took lessons at his studio for quite some time. He was the greatest practitioner and teacher of Kenpo I've ever met. Lost track of him, long, long ago. He took a skinny kid, afraid of his own shadow and made him into a very fit kid, afraid of his own shadow.
Jonathan,
That routine I do and Scotty York's X-Rated routine are so far apart from method and sequence that your statement makes zero sense to me. There is no way to do any of the opening sequences that show the cups empty with what I think you're suggesting.
For me, showing the cups unmistakably empty is astonishingly important. If I have real people in front of me, I ask them to look at (examine) the cups and speak briefly about them for a bit. I'm quite certain that without that emphasis, the smart guys will assume you started off with the loads in the cups. In all the clips I've seen of Vernon doing the cups, he chats jovially to the audience and shows the cups empty, (except for the oft-quoted bit of guile). I gleaned from that, Vernon thought it was important. Good enough for me.
The fragment after it that you end in a question mark has no meaning to me. I genuinely try to follow your posts and value your input. I think I'll give you a call for translation purposes. Thank you though.
As for putting more effort behind the presentation, I can assure you me efforts are quite genuine and that I've spent more time trying to figure out how to present the trick well than I did in coming up with and rehearsing the mechanical portions. Who knew that presenting a complex trick well was harder than practicing the rote portions of a physical sequence?
KG
I did know Terry. I took lessons at his studio for quite some time. He was the greatest practitioner and teacher of Kenpo I've ever met. Lost track of him, long, long ago. He took a skinny kid, afraid of his own shadow and made him into a very fit kid, afraid of his own shadow.
Jonathan,
That routine I do and Scotty York's X-Rated routine are so far apart from method and sequence that your statement makes zero sense to me. There is no way to do any of the opening sequences that show the cups empty with what I think you're suggesting.
For me, showing the cups unmistakably empty is astonishingly important. If I have real people in front of me, I ask them to look at (examine) the cups and speak briefly about them for a bit. I'm quite certain that without that emphasis, the smart guys will assume you started off with the loads in the cups. In all the clips I've seen of Vernon doing the cups, he chats jovially to the audience and shows the cups empty, (except for the oft-quoted bit of guile). I gleaned from that, Vernon thought it was important. Good enough for me.
The fragment after it that you end in a question mark has no meaning to me. I genuinely try to follow your posts and value your input. I think I'll give you a call for translation purposes. Thank you though.
As for putting more effort behind the presentation, I can assure you me efforts are quite genuine and that I've spent more time trying to figure out how to present the trick well than I did in coming up with and rehearsing the mechanical portions. Who knew that presenting a complex trick well was harder than practicing the rote portions of a physical sequence?
KG
- MagicianShaunATL
- Posts: 1
- Joined: May 6th, 2013, 2:26 pm
- Favorite Magician: Tommy Wonder or Tom Stone
- Location: Atlanta, Ga
- Contact:
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Kent,
No matter how many times I see "Fun Shop Cups and Balls" I smile and drift off to a place where magic real, if just for a few minutes. Thanks for a great piece of magic!
No matter how many times I see "Fun Shop Cups and Balls" I smile and drift off to a place where magic real, if just for a few minutes. Thanks for a great piece of magic!
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: May 5th, 2012, 11:56 am
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
First let me be clear. I am strictly an amateur but I have loved magic for almost 50 years. For me the pace was to slow. If this had been part of a full show I would have been wanting to see what was next. I think the patter suffers from the pace, too. Story telling is more fluid.
The technique (for me) was flawless.
The technique (for me) was flawless.
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
Mr. Miller,
Thanks for the feedback.
I've found slow to be preferable to the speed with which most perform the trick. I fear my real failing is not having a strong enough script.
I appreciate that you took the time to comment.
As I mentioned in the opening post, I struggle with this routine.
KG
PS
Thank you Shaun! Missed your earlier post.
Thanks for the feedback.
I've found slow to be preferable to the speed with which most perform the trick. I fear my real failing is not having a strong enough script.
I appreciate that you took the time to comment.
As I mentioned in the opening post, I struggle with this routine.
KG
PS
Thank you Shaun! Missed your earlier post.
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: June 11th, 2008, 10:59 am
Re: The Cups and Balls ca. 1963
I normally hate the Cups and Balls, mainly because
a) it's rushed
b) it's therefore confusing
c) everyone seems to be doing their own lame version of the Vernon routine
d) everyone's loads are screamingly obvious
e) it's written into magical law that you must do this trick to be any good
This was great! It fooled me! I didn't see the final loads coming and that blue ball, well...that was magic!
Thanks!
a) it's rushed
b) it's therefore confusing
c) everyone seems to be doing their own lame version of the Vernon routine
d) everyone's loads are screamingly obvious
e) it's written into magical law that you must do this trick to be any good
This was great! It fooled me! I didn't see the final loads coming and that blue ball, well...that was magic!
Thanks!