Page 1 of 1

Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 11th, 2006, 11:04 pm
by Guest
Would anyone be able to help me with finding out Dr.Krenzel's email information? I would really appreciate it.
Thank you very much.

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 12th, 2006, 6:19 am
by Jim Maloney_dup1
I don't have his contact info, but I could probably get it if I needed to. If no one responds with the info, shoot me an e-mail and I'll see if I can get it for you.

-Jim

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 13th, 2006, 11:27 am
by Tom Klem
Jim

Dr. Ken Krenzel's e-mail is mirakenATnyc.rr.com

Best,

Tom Klem

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 13th, 2006, 2:06 pm
by Guest
Originally posted by Tom Klem:
Jim

Dr. Ken Krenzel's e-mail is miraken AT nyc.rr.com

Best,

Tom Klem
PLEASE will people stop posting email address in here. There are email harvesting bots, right, that look at forums for blah@blah.com. When they see that syntax, that add you to their spam lists. If you are intent on publishing someone's private email address in public at least break it up a little using AT adn not @ and DOT instead of .

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 13th, 2006, 3:33 pm
by Richard Kaufman
You know what, I post my e-mail address in here all the time. I get LESS junk e-mail than I used to! Most of it is automatically detected and removed by Netscape anyway, so what's the big deal?

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 14th, 2006, 6:51 am
by Guest
Originally posted by Richard Kaufman:
You know what, I post my e-mail address in here all the time. I get LESS junk e-mail than I used to! Most of it is automatically detected and removed by Netscape anyway, so what's the big deal?
Glad you have an anti-spam solution that works Mr K.

Sorry if I bothered you by trying to let people know how email spam bots harvest forums. I won't do it again.

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 14th, 2006, 8:00 am
by Richard Kaufman
I don't have an anti-spam solution: I just turned on the junk mail filter in Netscape mail. All the e-mails that Netscape thinks are junk go into a separate folder and I cruise through them in about 15 seconds, deleting them into the trash. Once in a great while I find an e-mail that isn't junk.
It all works very quickly.

I used to receive several hundred junk e-mails a day and now I receive about 50 (including the ones that go in the junk folder). So, it's less of a problem than it used to be and my e-mail address has been posted on this site a dozen times.

So, my empirical evidence runs counter to your cautionary advice.

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 14th, 2006, 8:05 am
by Guest
Originally posted by Richard Kaufman:
I don't have an anti-spam solution: I just turned on the junk mail filter in Netscape mail.
Far be it from me to argue with the owner of this board, and that isn't what I am trying to do. But...your anti-spam solution *is* the one Netscape provides you with. A junk mail filter *is* an anti-spam solution.

I'm really glad it works for you.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe ... ms&spell=1

There is a link for 60k plus sites with information about how spam bots harvest email addresses. People not as lucky as you may find it of interest.

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 14th, 2006, 9:23 am
by Richard Kaufman
Feel free to argue, I'm simply giving you my experience as someone who has posted his e-mail address here numerous times.

Even without the Netscape junk mail filter, it just wouldn't be that big a deal because it would take only a few minutes to deal with each day.

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 14th, 2006, 10:10 am
by Guest
Originally posted by Richard Kaufman:
Feel free to argue, I'm simply giving you my experience as someone who has posted his e-mail address here numerous times.

Even without the Netscape junk mail filter, it just wouldn't be that big a deal because it would take only a few minutes to deal with each day.
I'm not arguing. I was just pointing out that you are using a anti-spam solution. And offering links to people without your good fortune.

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 14th, 2006, 3:36 pm
by Bob Farmer
Mark Lewis is at this very moment posting Richard's email address on every crazed forum extant.

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 15th, 2006, 7:08 am
by Tom Klem
Sorry to have started this additional part of this thread.

I personally will from now on e-mail the addresses of others privately.

I was just trying to be helpful.

Tom Klem

Re: Ken Krenzel

Posted: December 15th, 2006, 9:08 am
by Guest
I dont know why people have such a problem with spam. The way I figure it, I need all the stock market advice I can get, to pay for my p**** enlargement, and the supply of viagra I'll need to satisfy all these girls who are emailing me.