Ed Marlo and copyright
-
- Posts: 3308
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Ed Marlo and copyright
Bob, I think you misread my post. I wasn't saying there were no legal theories -- as you seem to think I said -- after quoting your reference to copyright, I said there were alternatives.
- Bob Cunningham
- Posts: 365
- Joined: May 25th, 2008, 4:11 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: Ed Marlo and copyright
Sorry, I am a little dense sometimes ;-)
-
- Posts: 3308
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Short card above selection.
Re: Ed Marlo and copyright
I'm a little dense all the time but hide it well.
-
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
- Location: Aurora IL
Re: Ed Marlo and copyright
Pete McCabe wrote:Doesn't "not authorized" mean "not authorized by the copyright holder?" In other words, aren't you already discussing copyright when you say "not authorized?"
No, Pete. The show was private and I gave no permission to video my performance and signed no release giving same. If this was a public performance and there were no restrictions posted about taping I probably wouldn't have much to say, but in this case the show was for a private client and there was no release proffered or signed. YouTube understood this and removed the video.