Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Discuss the latest news and rumors in the magic world.
User avatar
Richard Kaufman
Posts: 27069
Joined: July 18th, 2001, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Theodore DeLand
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Richard Kaufman » March 6th, 2010, 2:37 pm

Subscribe today to Genii Magazine

Ian Kendall
Posts: 2631
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Ian Kendall » March 6th, 2010, 3:13 pm

Hmmm. I wonder how it would work for a left handed user...

User avatar
Richard Kaufman
Posts: 27069
Joined: July 18th, 2001, 12:00 pm
Favorite Magician: Theodore DeLand
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Richard Kaufman » March 6th, 2010, 3:17 pm

... inconveniently.
Subscribe today to Genii Magazine

the Larry
Posts: 200
Joined: December 28th, 2008, 7:43 am

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby the Larry » March 6th, 2010, 4:18 pm

Wow. If this works as it is demoed in the video then my hat is off to Microsoft. I hate most of their products but this looks great.

Joe Mckay
Posts: 2026
Joined: April 13th, 2008, 6:56 am
Favorite Magician: Lubor Fiedler
Location: Durham, England

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Joe Mckay » March 6th, 2010, 7:12 pm

Looks like an iPad killer to me. Personally - I think history will record that Apple dropped the ball with the iPad. It is just a bigger iPhone but without the phone. In other words - boring.

Microsoft takes this round...

Joe

Bill Duncan
Posts: 1639
Joined: March 13th, 2008, 11:33 pm

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Bill Duncan » March 7th, 2010, 3:38 am

If they put Windows on another tablet it will fail just like the others. The thing that will make the iPad successful is the decision not to put OSX on it. Simple is better for computer appliances.

With iPod touch sales over 13 million, I think making a deluxe version was a no brainer. A long time back, when I got my Kindle reader for the iPod touch, I said what I really wanted was a paperback book sized touch so I'd have both a color Kindle and a great web browsing tool in one.

A 16GB (the cheap) iPad will sit on a table next to my couch, and probably get more use than my PC. And when I go on vacation it will take the place of my netbook.

Ian Kendall
Posts: 2631
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Ian Kendall » March 7th, 2010, 4:06 am

If they put Windows on another tablet it will fail just like the others


Not sure about that. This OS seems to be WinCE7, just as the iPad uses the iPhone OS. Cut down operating systems for these portable devices seems to be the way it's going.

Remember that there are the tablet PCs running Win7 on the way as well. I think I would get more use out of one of those, to be honest.

Ian

r paul wilson
Posts: 84
Joined: January 20th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby r paul wilson » March 7th, 2010, 4:23 am

I thought we weren't supposed to argue religion on this board?

P

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4242
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby mrgoat » March 7th, 2010, 12:13 pm

Joe Mckay wrote:Looks like an iPad killer to me. Personally - I think history will record that Apple dropped the ball with the iPad. It is just a bigger iPhone but without the phone. In other words - boring.

Microsoft takes this round...

Joe



To begin with, this round hasn't started yet, as neither device is on sale yet.

The iPad is a device for consuming content. The deals have been done with the publishers. All they care about is selling you magazine subscriptions, eBooks, TV shows and apps. It looks like it does all those things really well.

The Courier is a pen driven small computer. There is no book store announced. No deals with publishers in place. No magazine deals in place. No app store. And as it runs the Zune OS there are only 3 people in the world that know how to use it. Everyone with an iPhone knows how to use the iPad.

Also, Apple have a track record of releasing game changing hardware of late. iPod vs Zune. iPhone versus, um, no MS phone yet. And an iPad Versus a Courier.

WIth their track record and MS's extreme lack of experience in the hardware marketplace I would bet Apple. But it is a tad silly to say the 'round' is won and Apple lost, when neither bits of hardware are actually available yet?

You may well be right. For the first time in history, MS may copy an apple product and do it better than apple. However, seeing as they haven't pulled this off in 30 years, I wager they won't do it with this.

Ian Kendall
Posts: 2631
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Ian Kendall » March 7th, 2010, 1:35 pm

iPhone versus, um, no MS phone


Any HTC phone.

User avatar
BlueEyed Videot
Posts: 208
Joined: May 17th, 2008, 8:19 pm
Favorite Magician: Max Maven, Ray Anderson
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby BlueEyed Videot » March 7th, 2010, 2:13 pm

r paul wilson wrote:I thought we weren't supposed to argue religion on this board?

P


Ha ha! Funniest quip this year. Point goes to Mr. Wilson.

Bill Duncan
Posts: 1639
Joined: March 13th, 2008, 11:33 pm

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Bill Duncan » March 7th, 2010, 4:00 pm

For my part, it's not a religious issue. I have been using MS Windows since version 2.11. I currently own three Windows PCs and no Macs. But I do own an iPod Nano, and an iPod touch.

And for the record guys, Microsoft has been in the tablet PC game for about twenty years. Apple's patents for the iPhone/iPod touch go back about six or eight years.

The problem Microsoft has alway had was trying to put "Windows" on a touch/pen system. Palm showed how to do it, but no one except Apple seems to have paid attention.

If you look at best of the Windows Mobile devices they're the ones that don't look like they're running Windows.

Jonathan Townsend
Posts: 8709
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Westchester, NY
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Jonathan Townsend » March 7th, 2010, 6:00 pm

Still trying to duplicate Yeoman Rand's clipboard hoping Spock will notice?

Not so sure about trustworthy computing so long as in-circuit emulation ...

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4242
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby mrgoat » March 8th, 2010, 6:53 am

Ian Kendall wrote:
iPhone versus, um, no MS phone


Any HTC phone.


Oh don't confuse things by bringing android into a discussion about iPad Vs Courier.

:)

I want a nexus1, they look delicious. Just can't justify having two phones. I'm not a drug dealer.

Jonathan Townsend
Posts: 8709
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Westchester, NY
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Jonathan Townsend » March 8th, 2010, 8:10 am

Is it possible to get two lines working on one cell phone?
Call forwarding can get you incomming but from there... no ideas.

Suggestions?
Mundus vult decipi -per Caleb Carr's story Killing Time

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4242
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby mrgoat » March 8th, 2010, 8:39 am

Google Voice.

Or other forwarding services?

http://www.aitelephone.com/call-my-glob ... r-how.html

Ian Kendall
Posts: 2631
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Ian Kendall » March 8th, 2010, 9:13 am

Oh don't confuse things by bringing android into a discussion about iPad Vs Courier


I never mentioned Android. I've had four HTC phones running windows mobile, and all are great. My current one (Touch HD) is higher spec than the first iPhones, and the HD2 (which Angelo showed me in Blackpool) wipes the floor with the 3GS.

Ian

User avatar
Magic Newswire
Posts: 2500
Joined: March 29th, 2008, 12:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Magic Newswire » March 8th, 2010, 11:48 am

It will be interesting to see what actually come of this product. Price, Availability, etc...

Remember this great Microsoft innovation?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZrr7AZ9nCY

Ian Kendall
Posts: 2631
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Ian Kendall » March 8th, 2010, 12:18 pm

Hands up anyone who _doesn't_ want a surface computer :)

Ian Kendall
Posts: 2631
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Ian Kendall » March 8th, 2010, 12:28 pm


User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4242
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby mrgoat » March 8th, 2010, 2:02 pm

Ian Kendall wrote:Hands up anyone who _doesn't_ want a surface computer :)


But why?

Ooh, it knows you have put a glass down?

Seriously, what would you do with it, if it wasn't vapourware. Kevin Rose thinks the Courier is vapourware too btw.

Ian Kendall
Posts: 2631
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Ian Kendall » March 8th, 2010, 2:06 pm

Why not?

Admittedly, it's a geek thing, but I would be very tempted to dust off the coding head and develop a Subbuteo app. Now tell me _that_ wouldn't be k3wl :)

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4242
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby mrgoat » March 8th, 2010, 2:06 pm

Ian Kendall wrote:
Oh don't confuse things by bringing android into a discussion about iPad Vs Courier


I never mentioned Android. I've had four HTC phones running windows mobile, and all are great. My current one (Touch HD) is higher spec than the first iPhones, and the HD2 (which Angelo showed me in Blackpool) wipes the floor with the 3GS.

Ian


Windows mobile is [censored]. I know you know your stuff about many things, so assumed you would at least be talking about android.

:)

In any discussion about mobile operating systems most people laugh when someone talks about windows mobile. Even MS fanbois admit it's dreadful. :P

The new one, based on the Zune HD looks cool though.

Yes, the Nexus1 too is technically better than the iPhone 3GS by a long stretch.

New iPhone will be announced this month though, and available in June.

Ian Kendall
Posts: 2631
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Ian Kendall » March 8th, 2010, 3:22 pm

Windows Mobile is only bad if you don't know what you are doing. If you have a clue, it's a perfectly useable interface. Added to that, many devices now have a front end, so that the technophobes don't need to look under the hood, as it were.

Jonathan Townsend
Posts: 8709
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Westchester, NY
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Jonathan Townsend » March 8th, 2010, 3:35 pm

Ian Kendall wrote:Windows Mobile is only bad if you don't know what you are doing. ...


So now we need degrees in philosophy to use a phone?
Mundus vult decipi -per Caleb Carr's story Killing Time

Ian Kendall
Posts: 2631
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Ian Kendall » March 8th, 2010, 3:52 pm

Not philosophy, no.

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4242
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby mrgoat » March 8th, 2010, 3:57 pm

Ian Kendall wrote:Windows Mobile is only bad if you don't know what you are doing.


And Unix is a really great OS if you know how to drive a bash shell.

Shouldn't an OS for phones just, um, work?

And it's far from just me that doesn't like it:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/173272/w ... views.html

Ian Kendall
Posts: 2631
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Ian Kendall » March 8th, 2010, 5:29 pm

These devices are not just phones - they are computers with a phone app.

I've never been one to follow the herd, anyway :D

mfamagic
Posts: 19
Joined: February 4th, 2010, 11:10 am
Location: nyc

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby mfamagic » March 18th, 2010, 1:17 pm

r paul wilson wrote:I thought we weren't supposed to argue religion on this board?

P


Funny.

User avatar
Magic Newswire
Posts: 2500
Joined: March 29th, 2008, 12:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Magic Newswire » March 18th, 2010, 1:33 pm

BTW... The specs now posted on the Apple site show that the iPad will support any doc in an ePub format. I've also been haring talk of a number of magazines developing apps to supplement their hard copy content as opposed to supplying the same or enhanced content that is in a magazine.

User avatar
mrgoat
Posts: 4242
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 12:00 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby mrgoat » March 18th, 2010, 1:34 pm

Yes, I heard that on MacBreak Weekly yesterday. Great news.

But as Merlin Mann said, I wish I was rich enough to drop 500 bucks on something hardly anyone has seen or touched.

User avatar
Magic Newswire
Posts: 2500
Joined: March 29th, 2008, 12:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Microsoft's Response to the iPad

Postby Magic Newswire » March 18th, 2010, 1:58 pm

I'm with you. I'm not an early adopter. I like the idea, but will take a wait and see attitude. Kinda like Magic-Con. Sounds like a great idea... we'll see.


Return to “Buzz”